<![CDATA[Large Language Models (LLMs) are currently very diverse. Some of the largest include Chat-GPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude Sonet, Grok, and DeepSeek. Based on this, the plan of this research is to determine how efficient these AI models can be, based on their strengths in LLM training. In this study, we will examine the impact of LLM scaling parameters on the results of each local model we will test. This study also limits the number of parameters and classifies the questions to be asked. From these questions, we can identify and classify which local LLM models perform better when asked the same questions. Then, we will objectively evaluate each of them based on the results of the study. Thus, this study aims to establish a known correlation between scaling parameters and results. We also hope that it will be useful for improving work efficiency in selecting AI that suits user needs and expanding users' knowledge of AI so they can perform their jobs more efficiently and accurately. From this research, we conclude, aware of the results of the work that has been done, that local LLMs with large scaling are not entirely good and efficient. As with Gemma3, even with 12B parameters, the results weren't better than the Gemma3 model with 4B parameters. Alternatively, if you're using similar hardware to ours, you can use GPT-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20B) and Qwen3 (Qwen/Qwen3-4B & Qwen/Qwen3-8B), which offer good results in terms of reasoning and inference speed.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
