<![CDATA[Assessing the difficulty levels of Math Word Problems (MWPs) is essential for adaptive learning, yet most existing MWP datasets lack standardized difficulty annotations. This paper proposes a decision framework that integrates a 2-tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Decision Model (FLDM) with Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated difficulty estimation. A corpus of over 2,000 MWPs was compiled, of which 200 were annotated by seven instructors and an additional 454 were validated by ten experts. Consensus stability improved markedly (Fleiss’ κ = 0.14 → Cohen’s κ = 0.32), reflecting stronger alignment between expert judgments and the proposed fuzzy 2-tuple aggregation. Sixteen LLM configurations were evaluated, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4o-Mini, Gemini Flash, and LLaMA-3.2 under Zero-Shot, Five-Shot, and RAG settings. GPT-3.5 Zero-Shot achieved the best performance (Precision=0.65, Recall=0.63, F1=0.63), outperforming GPT-4o-Mini and Gemini variants. The validated dataset and linguistic ground truth were integrated into a web-based annotation system (themathbits.com), demonstrating scalability for real-world deployment. The results show that combining human linguistic judgments with fuzzy modeling and LLM inference improves reliability of MWP difficulty estimation, providing a foundation for future adaptive learning platforms. ]]>
Copyrights © 2026
