Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026): May

The Urgency of the Fifth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia: Reconstructing People’s Sovereignty from a Constitutional Law Perspective

Rinto Setiyawan (Program Pascasarjana, Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Islam Malang)
Alessandro Rey Nearson (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta)
Prayogi Restia Saputra (Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat Malang)



Article Info

Publish Date
25 May 2026

Abstract

General Background Constitutional amendment is a central mechanism for adapting a living constitution to social, political, and legal dynamics. Specific Background In the Indonesian constitutional framework, the post-amendment formulation of Article 1 paragraph (2) affirms that sovereignty lies in the people and is exercised according to the Constitution, yet public participation remains largely limited to electoral mechanisms. Knowledge Gap The existing constitutional arrangement has not fully translated people’s sovereignty into substantive participation, balanced institutional authority, and direct public control beyond elections. Aims This study examines the urgency of the fifth amendment to the 1945 Constitution in reconstructing people’s sovereignty from the perspective of constitutional law. Results The analysis shows that the fifth amendment is constitutionally possible under Article 37 and is directed toward strengthening participatory democracy, good governance, institutional balance, and clearer mechanisms for public involvement through referendum, legislative petitions, and direct oversight. The study also identifies the need to reposition the MPR as a balancing institution, clarify the separation of state functions, and address regulatory gaps in response to contemporary legal needs. Novelty The article offers a people-centered constitutional reconstruction model that combines MPR deliberation, public initiative, constitutional review, and possible referendum mechanisms. Implications A carefully designed and inclusive amendment process can deepen democratic substance, restore public legitimacy, and ensure that state authority operates for public welfare. Highlights: Public involvement remains largely confined to elections rather than substantive decision making. MPR positioning, checks and balances, and interinstitutional functions require clearer design. Referendum, legislative petitions, and direct oversight are proposed as channels for citizen control. Keywords: Constitutionalism; Sovereignty, Referendum, Governance, Democracy

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

ijler

Publisher

Subject

Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review (IJLER) is published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo four times a year. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of ...