<![CDATA[This study examines the legal protection of notaries against administrative sanctions imposed by the Notary Supervisory Council, specifically analyzing the ambiguity of norms in Article 7 paragraph (1) of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The research identifies that the undefined phrase "aggrieved party" creates legal uncertainty in notary supervision practices. Using normative juridical research methods with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this study comparatively analyzes Jakarta Administrative Court Decision Number 25/G/2025/PTUN.JKT (Anne Djoenardi case) and Jakarta Administrative Court Decision Number 235/G/2019/PTUN.JKT along with its appellate decisions (Muhammad Irsan case). The findings reveal that the norm's ambiguity allows processing of complaints from parties without legal standing, potentially leading to unjust administrative sanctions. The study demonstrates that preventive legal protection through regulatory clarity and repressive legal protection through Administrative Courts are essential for ensuring due process of law for notaries. The research concludes by proposing explicit criteria for defining "aggrieved party" and mandatory legal standing verification mechanisms in early examination stages.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
