Jurnal Ulunnuha
Vol 15, No 1 (2026): June

The Methodology of Sanad Criticism Employed by Ibn al-Jawzī, al-Suyūṭī, ‎and Ibn Ḥajar in Detecting Mawḍū‘ Hadith: A Comparative Study and Its ‎Relevance in the Digital Era

Dila Kusuma Amanda (Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri)
Ahmad Syarifudin (Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Jun 2026

Abstract

The proliferation of fabricated hadiths (maudhu‘) throughout Islamic history, driven by political, sectarian, ‎and ideological motivations, necessitated rigorous methodological frameworks for hadith verification. Ibn ‎al-Jawzī (d. 597 AH) developed one of the most influential yet contested approaches to identifying ‎fabricated narrations through his seminal work al-Maudhu‘āt. While existing studies have examined hadith ‎classification and general principles of hadith criticism, no comprehensive comparative analysis has ‎systematically evaluated the epistemological foundations and methodological distinctions among Ibn al-‎Jawzī, al-Suyūṭī, and Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī within an integrated sanad-matn framework, nor explored their ‎relevance to contemporary digital-era disinformation challenges. This study aims to analyze Ibn al-Jawzī's ‎sanad-criticism methodology for detecting fabricated hadiths in al-Maudhu‘āt, compare it with the ‎methodologies of al-Suyūṭī and Ibn Ḥajar, and evaluate the relevance of these classical approaches to ‎religious information verification in the digital age. This research employs a qualitative approach ‎combining intellectual history analysis, content analysis, and comparative methodology, with al-Maudhu‘āt ‎as the primary data source, supplemented by al-La‘ālī al-Maṣnū‘ah and Lisān al-Mīzān as secondary ‎sources. The findings reveal three epistemologically distinct methodological poles: Ibn al-Jawzī’s ‎eliminative-preventive approach, which prioritizes a single defective transmitter as sufficient grounds for ‎maudhu‘ judgment; al-Suyūṭī’s inclusive-moderate approach, which demands comprehensive cross-chain ‎verification before issuing verdicts; and Ibn Ḥajar’s systematic historico-critical approach, which cross-‎references biographical data and evaluates comment consistency across sources. These three ‎methodologies constitute a layered verification framework applicable to contemporary hadith ‎authentication challenges, particularly for detecting religiously fabricated content on social media and for ‎developing AI-based hadith verification algorithms. This study offers a reconstructed epistemological ‎model of classical hadith verification that bridges pre-modern scholarship and digital-era information ‎literacy, providing methodological foundations for AI-assisted systems for Islamic information ‎authentication.‎

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

ulunnuha

Publisher

Subject

Religion

Description

Jurnal Ulunnuha adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Prodi Tafsir Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. Jurnal ini fokus memuat tulisan yang diangkatkan dari hasil penelitian, pemikiran, gagasan konseptual atau kajian analitis kritis yang berkaitan dengan al-Qur`an dan ...