This study investigates the use of project-based learning analytics as a diagnostic approach to identify gaps between administrative completion and conceptual design quality in sustainability-oriented biology teaching modules developed by pre-service biology teachers. Participants were 63 pre-service biology teachers from two classes (5A = 30 students; 5B = 33 students), who produced 13 group teaching modules. Data included project scores, formative scores, midterm and final examination scores, project-component records, questionnaire responses, and design-gap rubric scores. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, comparison between administrative and conceptual components, and percentage-based design-gap analysis across curriculum alignment, assessment design, digital pedagogy, deep learning, and sustainability integration. Results showed that overall student performance was relatively good and homogeneous, with a mean final score of 81.34 and a standard deviation of 2.23. However, full administrative completion of project drafts and progress reports (100.00%) did not correspond to conceptual design quality. The final teaching modules achieved only 34.90% of the target criteria for coherent integration of module components. The largest design gap was found in sustainability integration (76.90%), followed by deep learning (69.20%), assessment design (61.50%), digital pedagogy (53.80%), and curriculum alignment (46.20%). These findings indicate that project completion does not automatically ensure coherent instructional design. This study contributes by demonstrating that project-based learning analytics can reveal hidden weaknesses in sustainability-oriented instructional design that are not captured by final grades or document completion alone. The findings highlight the need for operational rubrics, formative feedback, model modules, and explicit design scaffolding.
Copyrights © 2026