State land is an agrarian resource whose management is in the hands of the government as a representative of the state based on the right to control as mandated by the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) Number 5 of 1960. However, in the practice of governance, the use of state land often causes conflicts and clashes with existing individual rights inherent in individuals and legal entities. This study examines the legal implications arising from the use of state land on individual rights, both in terms of ownership rights, cultivation rights, building rights, and usage rights. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by primary legal materials in the form of laws and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of land law literature. The results of the study indicate that the use of state land that does not pay attention to the principles of legal certainty, justice, and benefit has the potential to result in the loss or reduction of individual rights unilaterally without adequate compensation, which is contrary to the constitution. Regulatory harmonization is needed between the provisions of the UUPA, the Job Creation Law, and technical land regulations to provide stronger legal protection for individual rights holders on state land.
Copyrights © 2026