<![CDATA[This study examines the practice of searches in criminal procedure from a human rights perspective. Searches are a coercive measure that can affect individual privacy and freedom, and therefore must be implemented in accordance with human rights principles. This study highlights the importance of balancing the interests of law enforcement and the protection of individual rights in the search process. The research method used is a normative method with a legislative approach and case analysis to evaluate the conformity of search practices with applicable human rights standards. The research findings show that although Indonesian criminal procedure law regulates search procedures, there are a number of challenges in its implementation that could potentially violate human rights, such as violations of the right to privacy and substandard procedures. Several cases have shown searches conducted without authorization or exceeding authority, which has implications for individual rights violations. Therefore, updates and increased oversight of search procedures are needed to ensure that human rights are respected. This research suggests the need for clearer regulatory enforcement and stricter oversight of search practices in criminal procedure. Furthermore, training and awareness of law enforcement officials regarding the importance of human rights in all law enforcement actions need to be improved. These measures are expected to ensure that searches can be conducted effectively and fairly, without compromising the protection of individual rights.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
