<![CDATA[Western scholarship on hadith has been shaped by philological, historical-critical, and transmission-based approaches that view hadith both as a normative Islamic source and as historical evidence of early Muslim intellectual, legal, and theological development. Within this tradition, Arent Jan Wensinck holds an important yet ambivalent position. His bibliographical works, especially A Handbook of Early Muhammadan Tradition and Concordance et indices de la Tradition Musulmane, later known as Miftāḥ Kunūz al-Sunnah and al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfāẓ al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī, greatly advanced hadith retrieval, textual comparison, and thematic indexing. Yet his interpretation of hadith, Sunnah, and Islamic creed was shaped by orientalist assumptions, Semitic philology, comparative religion, and historical criticism, leading him to regard parts of the hadith corpus as products of early Muslim communal development influenced by Jewish, Christian, Hellenistic, and Near Eastern traditions. This article reassesses Wensinck’s contribution by distinguishing his technical-bibliographical achievements from his theoretical-historical assumptions. Using qualitative library research with historical-critical and intellectual-biographical approaches, it examines his major works, methodology, and scholarly reception. The study argues that Wensinck’s legacy cannot be reduced to orientalist skepticism or bibliographical utility. While valuable for takhrīj and indexing, his conclusions require critique through classical and contemporary hadith epistemology in Western hadith studies today]]>
Copyrights © 2026
