<![CDATA[This study examines the application of a combination of the WENSLO and MUNRA methods in selecting the best employees based on various criteria to address issues of subjectivity and instability in employee rankings that often arise when data is heterogeneous and criteria are conflicting. The WENSLO method is used to assess and prioritize criteria through structured and preference-based weighting, while MUNRA plays a role in consistently normalizing data and calculating weighted scores for each alternative. The integration of these two methods allows for a more objective evaluation, reduces subjective bias, and produces stable employee rankings even in the presence of data variations or conflicting criteria. The Employee Ranking results show that the top-performing employee is Lestari with a score of 1.3092, followed by Susilo with a score of 1.3080 and Maharani with a score of 1.3003, indicating superior and relatively balanced performance. These findings confirm that the combination of WENSLO and MUNRA can produce clear, objective, and effective employee rankings, as well as provide an adaptive framework to support strategic human resource management.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
