This study presents a comparative analysis of four deep learning architectures: Simple Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Deep MLP, Basic Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and LeNet Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The models are evaluated on the MNIST handwritten digit dataset under identical experimental conditions using CPU-only hardware. Each model is assessed based on classification accuracy, training time, and number of trainable parameters. Experimental results demonstrate that convolutional architectures consistently outperform fully connected architectures in classification accuracy, with the Basic CNN achieving the highest validation accuracy of 99.15% and the LeNet CNN offering the best balance between performance and efficiency with only 61,706 trainable parameters. The findings confirm that architectural design has a greater influence on model performance than the number of layers or parameters alone. This study provides a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, detailed architectural descriptions, experimental methodology, and a thorough analysis of results to support the comparative conclusions.
Copyrights © 2026