<![CDATA[This thesis examines the legal force of decisions of Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK) and the limits of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) authority in reviewing State Administrative Decisions (KTUN) related to ethical violations by the Chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK), particularly through Decision Number 604/G/2023/PTUN.JKT. Using a doctrinal approach, the study finds that the execution of MKMK Decision Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 became legally uncertain after the PTUN ruling altered key aspects of the decision, including the revocation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 17 of 2023 and the restoration of Anwar Usman’s dignity. This situation places the enforcement of MKMK’s ethical sanctions under judicial review. Therefore, clearer limits between ethical oversight and legal adjudication are required. Strengthening MKMK’s institutional status with final and binding authority could enhance the enforcement of constitutional judicial ethics.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
