<![CDATA[This study conducts a legal analysis of the Bekasi City Government's practice of delegating the function of collecting Public Service Retribution for On-Street Parking to Community Organizations (Ormas). This action generates a structural conflict by involving a non-governmental entity in the management of public funds, leading to the risk of Local Own-Source Revenue (PAD) leakage and consumer rights violations. Examination of this practice against the three pillars of State Administrative Law Competence, Legality, and Accountability reveals significant issues. In terms of Competence, the City Government risks committing an ultra vires action by transferring the collection function to a private subject without an adequate legal basis. Regarding Legality, the Regional Regulation (Perda) suffers from a rechtvacuum (legal void), as it fails to clearly mandate the mechanism for Ormas appointment, thus violating the Principle of Legality. Furthermore, concerning Accountability, the manual system managed by the Ormas is highly vulnerable to under-reporting and illegal levies, while violating the City Government's Principle of No Transfer of Responsibility for public funds. Therefore, this research recommends that the Bekasi City Government revise the Regional Regulation immediately, terminate the collection delegation function to Ormas, and enforce a total transition to an integrated, non-cash Smart Parking (e-parking) system to close PAD leakage loopholes and ensure consumer protection.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
