<![CDATA[Circular resolutions, as a mechanism for corporate decision-making without convening a physical meeting, require unanimous written approval from all shareholders as mandated by Article 91 of the Indonesian Company Law. The dispute examined in District Court Decision No. 46/Pdt.G/2023/PN Cbi illustrates a violation of this requirement, where one shareholder never provided written consent although the document was used by the notary to issue the Statement of Meeting Resolution Deed (PKR). This situation not only invalidated the resolution but also raised questions regarding the notary’s responsibility in verifying the authenticity and completeness of documents that form the basis of an authentic deed. This study discusses the legal framework governing circular resolutions in Indonesia and analyzes the notary’s role and legal liability when formal requirements are not met. Using the perspectives of justice, legal certainty, and utility, the research emphasizes the importance of strict verification by notaries to protect shareholder rights and prevent misuse of corporate decision-making procedures. Keywords: Circular resolution, Notary, Limited Liability Company, PKR Deed, Legal Certainty]]>
Copyrights © 2026
