<![CDATA[This study examines employee-centric corporate social responsibility (CSR) as quality infrastructure in Philippine private higher education institutions (HEIs). It addresses a persistent managerial problem: employee well-being initiatives often exist as isolated activities, while workload design, psychosocial risk, inclusion, employee voice, and professional development remain weakly integrated into governance and quality assurance. A qualitative documentary synthesis was conducted using a purposively assembled corpus of 14 sources published from 2020 to 2024, comprising Philippine higher education policies and accreditation guidance, international standards and policy documents, and peer-reviewed studies and reviews. The sources were analyzed through structured coding, cross-source comparison, and contribution-oriented interpretation across five domains: workload fairness, psychosocial safety, inclusion and dignity, employee voice, and capability development. The synthesis identifies three central findings. First, workload transparency and recognition of allied tasks form the operational foundation of credible internal CSR. Second, psychosocial support produces limited value when institutions address symptoms but leave organizational hazards unchanged. Third, employee voice and leadership follow-through connect internal CSR to service continuity by enabling risks to be identified before they affect students. The study proposes that employee-centric CSR creates internal social impact when it is embedded in decision rights, monitoring routines, and quality assurance rather than delivered as stand-alone welfare programs. The findings offer a practical governance framework for private HEI leaders while avoiding causal claims that cannot be supported by documentary evidence.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
