<![CDATA[This study examines the ethical dimensions of (un)spoken harm in digital spaces, focusing on sarcasm, cyberbullying, and disability stigmatization. The increasing prevalence of derogatory expressions and humiliating interactions on social media raises important ethical questions concerning human dignity, responsible communication, and the treatment of vulnerable individuals in digital communities. This study employs a netnographic approach with four stages: investigation, interaction, immersion, and integration. The findings reveal recurring patterns of derogatory communication that contribute to the stigmatization and social marginalization of individuals with disabilities. At the same time, some individuals demonstrate resilience by continuing to participate actively in digital spaces despite experiencing stigmatizing and hostile interactions. Community responses also vary, ranging from expressions of support and solidarity to indifference and tacit acceptance of harmful behavior. These findings indicate that digital harm may operate through both explicit verbal aggression and seemingly casual forms of sarcasm and ridicule. This research argues that addressing cyberbullying requires an ethical framework capable of recognizing subtle forms of harm alongside overt abuse. The study contributes to discussions on Islamic ethics, digital culture, and disability by proposing a more inclusive approach to digital communication grounded in dignity, responsibility, and social respect.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
