Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada (JIKSH)
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Articles in Press

Phenylephrine versus ephedrine as prophylactic vasopressors for spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension: A randomized double-blind clinical trial

Awaluddin Awaluddin (Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Mhd Ihsan (Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Bastian Lubis (Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Rina Amelia (Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Aug 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) remains one of the most frequent hemodynamic complications during spinal anesthesia, particularly among high-risk surgical patients. Vasopressor agents such as phenylephrine and ephedrine are commonly administered to prevent hypotension; however, their comparative effectiveness in maintaining hemodynamic stability remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the differences between phenylephrine and ephedrine in preventing SAIH among patients undergoing surgery with spinal anesthesia at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. Research Methodology: A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted between July and September 2023 at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. A total of 38 elective surgical patients receiving spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups: phenylephrine bolus 50 μg (n=19) and ephedrine bolus 5 mg (n=19). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, were measured every 2 minutes for 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia. Data were analyzed using an independent t-test and Mann–Whitney test with a significance level of p<0.05. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline demographic characteristics between groups (p>0.05). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the ephedrine group at minutes 18–22 after spinal anesthesia (T9–T11) compared with the phenylephrine group (p=0.026; p=0.039; p=0.031, respectively). No significant differences in diastolic blood pressure were found during the observation period (all p > 0.05). Heart rate was significantly higher in the ephedrine group during the first 14 minutes of observation, particularly at T4 and T5 (90.6±11.2 vs 73.3±17.3 bpm; p=0.001 and 90.3±8.6 vs 71.0±14.5 bpm; p=0.001). Conclusion: Phenylephrine and ephedrine demonstrated comparable effectiveness in maintaining systolic and diastolic blood pressure during spinal anesthesia. However, ephedrine was associated with a significantly greater heart rate response than phenylephrine. Phenylephrine may therefore be considered a preferable option for preventing SAIH in patients requiring more stable heart rate control

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

jiksh

Publisher

Subject

Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Description

The scope of this journal includes research that intends to review and understand nursing health care interventions and health policies that utilize advanced nursing research from an Asian perspective. The Sandi Husada Health Scientific Journal publishes research related to clinical, community, and ...