PALAR : Pakuan Law Review
Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): Volume 12, Number 3 July-September 2026

Skck's Position In The Former Nomination Process Corruption Convicts As Legislative Candidates Based On Perspective On Election Law

Wahyu Bassevi Putra Bassevi Putra (Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati)
Waluyadi (Fakultas Hukum, Swadaya Gunung Jati University, Indonesia)



Article Info

Publish Date
10 Aug 2026

Abstract

This study analyzes the issuance of Police Clearance Certificates (SKCK) for former corruption convicts running as legislative candidates, explicitly addressing the relationship between the function of SKCK, the guarantee of political rights for former corruption convicts following Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XX/2022, and the effectiveness of the candidacy verification process carried out by the General Election Commission (KPU). Using an empirical legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, primary data were gathered through interviews with local police departments and the KPU. The findings reveal three key results. First, both normatively and in practice at the Police Resort (Polres) level, SKCK functions purely as an administrative document that objectively records an applicant's criminal history, not as an instrument for assessing political eligibility; consequently, the political rights of former corruption convicts who meet the rights-restoration requirements under Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XX/2022 having completed their sentence, passed a specified waiting period, not being a repeat offender, and having openly disclosed their status to the public remain protected and cannot be nullified solely on the basis of the criminal record noted in the SKCK. Second, the KPU's candidacy verification process remains formal-administrative in nature and is not yet supported by adequate data integration among the police, the Directorate General of Corrections (Ditjen PAS), and the KPU itself, leaving the KPU without an independent means of confirming the accuracy of a candidate's disclosed status. Third, this data-integration gap opens the door to double standards in candidacy verification, it risks clearing candidates whose disclosure has not been genuinely verified, while simultaneously permitting subjective judgments that could discriminate against former corruption convicts who have, in fact, met all requirements. The study recommends harmonizing regulations across the Election Law, police regulations on SKCK, and the KPU's technical rules, alongside strengthening inter-agency data integration, so that candidacy verification can proceed consistently, transparently, and without discrimination, without compromising the protection of citizens' political rights. Keywords: SKCK, former convict, political rights, elections, legislative candidate, administrative discrimination.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

palar

Publisher

Subject

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Description

Welcome to the official website of PAKUAN LAW REVIEW PALAR. This website is intended to disseminate knowledge about the legal system in Indonesia to the wider community. It provides academic journal articles that can be downloaded for free. The journals published are an important reference for legal ...