<![CDATA[Green finance in Aceh sits at the intersection of Indonesia’s sustainable-finance regime, Aceh’s special autonomy, mandatory sharia compliance and the environmental harms associated with unlicensed gold mining. This article argues that the framework is procedurally dense but substantively fragmented: it requires plans, disclosure and taxonomic classification without integrating ecological legality, harm prevention and remediation into financing duties. Through doctrinal analysis and limited functional comparison, it constructs a Prevent–Transition–Restore model. The model links negative screening and traceability to inclusive sharia financing for livelihood transition and ring-fenced instruments for ecological restoration, while preserving the distinction between fiqh reasoning and enforceable positive law.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
