<![CDATA[This research focuses on the application of Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2020 in enforcing the law against such violations, as well as the judge's considerations in rendering the verdict for the defendant in Case Number 16/Pid.C/2024/PN Sda. The research method employed is normative juridical, utilizing statutory and case study approaches. Data were collected through library research and an analysis of the court decision. The findings indicate that law enforcement in this case complies with the provisions of Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2020. The judge imposed a criminal fine on the defendant by taking into account the elements of the offense, the evidence presented, and sociological factors. The judge's considerations emphasized the balance among legal certainty, utility, and justice. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the regulation's implementation remains influenced by law enforcement personnel, available facilities, public awareness, and local culture. In conclusion, although law enforcement has functioned effectively, there is a need to enhance public legal awareness and strengthen the role of the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) to ensure the regulation's objectives are achieved optimally.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
