<![CDATA[Surabaya's congestion in the "Friday of Horror" phenomenon dismantles the fundamental constraint of city mobility, namely the zero redundancy of the network. Public transportation is stuck rigidly in arterial corridors with no alternative routes. This research evaluates how the weaknesses of the route design collide with the stuttering of institutions responding to citizens' digital protests. Through an exploratory qualitative approach, data were dissected from two fronts: netnography of 855 comments on @tfsurabaya advocacy accounts, then cross-validated with in-depth interviews of 50 regular commuters (N1-N50). Thefindings of the study show the limitations of policy assumptions that have been oriented towards increasing capacity. All informants proved systemic redundancy failure, namely large capacity buses automatically paralyzed when the main road is blocked. The architecture of the route is too linear. WiraWiri's fleet of feeders, which was designed to be agile, actually rotated back to the center of the congestion. Institutionally, the fragmentation of authority between the City Government, the Provincial Government, and KAI triggers an artificial service response. Authorities fail to read digital vigilantism as a demand for real accountability, and still treat it as a random complaint. Fleet additions without changes in network structure have the potential to result in limited effectiveness. Surabaya urges the activation of emergency routes across second-class roads, a total overhaul of bus stop priorities, and the establishment of the Greater Surabaya Transportation Authority to cut the sectoral impasse.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
