<![CDATA[Introduction: The rampant theft of public facilities, including toll road guardrails, is an unlawful act that causes material losses to managers and has the potential to endanger the safety of road users. The complexity of this crime increases when carried out continuously, magnifying the impact of losses and risks, and causing public unrest that requires stricter supervision of toll road infrastructure. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the judge's considerations in deciding the case of the theft of toll road barrier iron which is carried out continuously and in incriminating circumstances, based on the study of Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk. Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical approach by examining applicable laws, as well as an empirical approach through interviews with investigators, public prosecutors, and judges at the Tanjung Karang District Court. Secondary data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, as well as primary data from interviews. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings show that the legal consequences against the perpetrators in Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2025/PN Tjk are comprehensive and proportional, including detention, imprisonment for 2 (two) years, confiscation and return of evidence, and the imposition of case costs. This is in line with the theory of legal consequences of R. Soeroso, which emphasizes that every criminal event gives rise to rights and obligations for the perpetrator as well as the authority of the state to uphold justice. The judge's consideration in deciding this case has met the elements of continuing and incriminating theft, including the analysis of evidence, trial facts, social impact, and aggravating and mitigating circumstances. This finding is in line with the theory of consideration of judge Sudikno Mertokusumo in balancing legal certainty, justice, and benefits for the defendant and the community.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
