Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Vol 7, No 4: December 2026

Remote Photoplethysmography-Based HbA1c Estimation for Community Screening of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Screening Tool or Diagnostic Alternative?

Ernawati Ernawati (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Yohanes Firmansyah (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Alexander Halim Santoso (Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
David Wongso (Faculty of Business, Monash University)
Diana Dinali (Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Muhammad Fikri Dzakwan (Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Bryan Anna Wijaya (Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Sri Tiatri (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Putu Tommy Yudha Sumatera Suyasa (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia)
Meiske Yunithree Suparman (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia)



Article Info

Publish Date
02 Oct 2026

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains a major global health burden, with a high proportion of undiagnosed cases, particularly in community settings with limited access to laboratory testing. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has emerged as a non-invasive, camera-based technology with potential for scalable screening. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement, diagnostic performance, and clinical role of rPPG-derived HbA1c as a screening tool or diagnostic alternative for T2DM. A cross-sectional diagnostic validation study was conducted among adults in a community setting in Semanan Subdistrict, Jakarta. Participants underwent non-contact facial scanning using an rPPG system alongside standard laboratory measurements of HbA1c and blood glucose. Agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis and Cohen’s Kappa. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. rPPG-derived HbA1c showed a significant mean difference compared with laboratory measurements (0.63%; p 0.001; 95% CI: 0.34–0.93), indicating systematic bias. Categorical agreement was poor (κ = 0.029; p = 0.403). In screening analysis, sensitivity ranged from 65.38% to 97.37%, while specificity ranged from 8.91% to 59.55%, with consistently high negative predictive values (≥82%). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.668 (p = 0.008) for diabetes and 0.711 (p 0.001) for prediabetes, indicating modest to acceptable discriminative ability. rPPG-based HbA1c estimation lacks sufficient agreement for diagnostic use. However, its relatively high sensitivity and scalability suggest that it may warrant further evaluation as a non-invasive screening tool for early detection and population-level risk stratification within mobile health settings.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

JADS

Publisher

Subject

Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management

Description

One of the current hot topics in science is data: how can datasets be used in scientific and scholarly research in a more reliable, citable and accountable way? Data is of paramount importance to scientific progress, yet most research data remains private. Enhancing the transparency of the processes ...