TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, dan Humaniora
Vol 7, No 3 (2026)

Perbedaan Regulasi Emosi antara Mahasiswa yang Melaksanakan dan Tidak Melaksanakan Puasa Senin–Kamis

Hidayat, Isna Syamsiarief (Unknown)
Ulya, Amalia (Unknown)
Syamila Zain, Adzkia (Unknown)
Kelrey, Musriyadie (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Sep 2026

Abstract

Emotion regulation is an important psychological capacity that enables individuals to manage emotional experiences and responses adaptively. For university students, this capacity is relevant to academic, social, and developmental demands. From an Islamic psychology perspective, voluntary Monday–Thursday fasting is understood as a spiritual practice that involves self-restraint and behavioral control. Previous studies have examined fasting in relation to self-control, self-regulation, emotional intelligence, and emotional stability; however, comparative evidence concerning specific emotion-regulation strategies remains limited. This study aimed to examine differences in overall emotion regulation between Muslim undergraduate students who practiced Monday–Thursday fasting and those who did not, with an exploratory analysis of five emotion-regulation strategies based on Gross’s Process Model of Emotion Regulation. A quantitative comparative design was employed with 48 Muslim undergraduate students aged 18–22 years recruited using purposive sampling. Participants comprised 20 students who had practiced Monday–Thursday fasting regularly for at least one month and 28 students who had not practiced it regularly during the same period. Data were collected using a 24-item Emotion Regulation Scale covering Situation Selection, Situation Modification, Attentional Deployment, Cognitive Change, and Response Modulation. The primary analysis used an independent-samples t test. The fasting group had a higher mean emotion-regulation score (M = 94.75, SD = 13.14) than the non-fasting group (M = 91.68, SD = 9.17), but the difference was not statistically significant, t = 0.955, p = .345, Cohen’s d = 0.280, 95% CI for the mean difference [-3.40, 9.54]. Exploratory dimensional analyses indicated moderate effect sizes for Attentional Deployment (d = 0.544, p = .070) and Response Modulation (d = 0.470, p = .115), although neither difference reached statistical significance. These findings indicate that no statistically significant difference in overall emotion regulation was identified between the two groups in this sample. The observed patterns in Attentional Deployment and Response Modulation require confirmation in studies with larger samples and more rigorous designs.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

trilogi

Publisher

Subject

Humanities Computer Science & IT Engineering Public Health Other

Description

The focus of TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, dan Humaniora is a peer-reviewed journal, open-access journal is to provide readers the original articles on various issues within technology, health, and social humanities. The scope of TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, dan Humaniora ...