Sinkron : Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika
Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): Research Articles October 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Random Forest and XGBoost for Bearing Capacity Prediction On Slopes

Rahmathiyah Amanda (Departement of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia)
Lindung Zalbuin Mase (Departement Geotechnical Hazard Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 3871, Indonesia)
Aidil Fitriansyah (Departement Geotechnical Hazard Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 3871, Indonesia)
Rena Misliniyati (Departement Geotechnical Hazard Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 3871, Indonesia)
Muharram Nur Fikri (Departement Geotechnical Hazard Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu 3871, Indonesia)



Article Info

Publish Date
05 Oct 2026

Abstract

Predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations is crucial in geotechnical planning because it is directly related to the safety and stability of the structure. This is especially true for foundations located at the edge of a slope. However, conventional analytical methods often fail to capture the complex and nonlinear relationships between soil and foundation parameters. This study evaluates the performance of Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ensemble machine learning models for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity (q_ult) of shallow foundations in non-cohesive soils on slopes, with emphasis on methodological rigor and physical model interpretability. The dataset consists of 393 secondary data points obtained from numerical modeling based on the Finite Element Method (FEM) in a previous study. Input variables include slope angle (sin β), foundation width (B), foundation depth (Df), and soil angle of internal friction (tan φ), while ultimate bearing capacity (qult) is used as the output variable. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and the A20 index.  Both models achieved a test R² of 0.97. XGBoost demonstrated superior generalization with a test RMSE of 7.130 kN/m² and MAPE of 8.833%, while Random Forest achieved a higher A20 index of 88.136% compared to 86.44% for XGBoost.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

sinkron

Publisher

Subject

Computer Science & IT

Description

Scope of SinkrOns Scientific Discussion 1. Machine Learning 2. Cryptography 3. Steganography 4. Digital Image Processing 5. Networking 6. Security 7. Algorithm and Programming 8. Computer Vision 9. Troubleshooting 10. Internet and E-Commerce 11. Artificial Intelligence 12. Data Mining 13. Artificial ...