<![CDATA[This study examines the effectiveness of the relevant parties in handling post-fire mitigation measures during the recovery period. in its implementation and management of post-fire conditions including the rehabilitation and reconstruction of buildings and infrastructure for victims affected in the long term. System improvements, for relevant parties such as the government and stakeholders related to post-fire mitigation procedure policies to be more effective and help in improving future disaster management systems. The method used in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. By using descriptive research in this study, it is hoped that all data can be obtained completely and accurately related to the analysis using PESTEL analysis, literature studies and secondary surveys. The results of the study indicate that fire disaster mitigation has not been effective. Because both structural and non-structural mitigation components do not exist and have not been implemented starting from the preparation of APAR, socialization of the BPBD service on pre-disaster mitigation, as well as land preparation and access to clean water. What is currently underway is the implementation of the construction of houses for affected victims, through the KOTAKU program, irrigation and the creation of TPS at the affected location. Social recovery for affected victims through non-structural mitigation in the community has not yet been carried out with other capacity building training including basic pre-disaster training, even though the location and residence of the community, seen from the conditions and environment, is a location prone to fire disasters.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
