<![CDATA[This study analyzes the legal status of information obligations and the prohibition of producing syubhat (doubtful) products from the perspective of Islamic muamalah jurisprudence and Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The research employs a library research method with a normative juridical approach and descriptive-comparative analysis. The findings indicate that muamalah jurisprudence and the Consumer Protection Law share similarities in emphasizing the principles of honesty, information transparency, and the prohibition of tadlis (fraud) and gharar (uncertainty). The differences lie in their legal sources, scope of regulation, concept of syubhat products, forms of sanctions, and legal orientation. Muamalah jurisprudence positions the information obligation as a mandatory legal duty with moral-spiritual dimensions, whereas the Consumer Protection Law treats it as an imperative obligation accompanied by civil and criminal sanctions. Regarding the prohibition of producing syubhat products, muamalah jurisprudence prohibits it when the doubt arises from information concealment or the practice of tadlis and gharar, while the Consumer Protection Law does not explicitly recognize the term syubhat but provides protection instruments through the prohibition of trading goods that do not meet standards and misleading information. Both legal systems are complementary and can be harmonized to achieve comprehensive consumer protection.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
