The Southeast Asia Law Journal
Vol 1, No 1 (2015)

The Independence Judge Verdict in Tax Dispute Resolution

Sartono Sartono (Tax Court Judge)
Tumanggor Tumanggor (University of Jayabaya)
Sri Soemantri (University of Jayabaya)
Wiratni Ahmadi (University of Jayabaya)
Satya Arinanto (University of Jayabaya)



Article Info

Publish Date
19 Aug 2017

Abstract

Tax tribunal as a specialized court exercising judicial powers to investigate and adjudicate tax disputes still using a system of dualism coaching, because until now there has been no revision or amendment of Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Tax tribunal. Independence and freedom of the Tax tribunal judge in deciding tax disputes must uphold justice, and not subject to and bound by any party. This research using theory of Justice based on the Pancasila. Grand Theory, theory of the State of Law as the Middle Range Theory and an Independent Judicial Power Theory. Applied Theory. This research was conducted using a normative juridical. Based on the research results show that the Tax tribunal judge in examining and deciding tax disputes has been carrying out its obligations which reflect the independence and the independence of judges and impartially and has fulfilled the principles of independent judicial power, in accordance with the provisions of Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution.

Copyrights © 2015






Journal Info

Abbrev

Law_Journal

Publisher

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

The Southeast Asia Law Journal (SALJ) The Southeast Asian Law Journal (SALJ) is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting a broad perspective on law justice issues within the domestic Indonesia. SALJ provides a forum for social scientists to report research findings for informed policy making with ...