cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Akta
ISSN : 24069426     EISSN : 25812114     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta
Core Subject : Social,
JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Master Program (S2) Notary, Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islmic University. JURNAL AKTA published four times a year in March, June, September and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal has been acredited
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 26 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 2 (2017)" : 26 Documents clear
PERAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA IZIN ROYA HAK TANGGUNGAN KARENA HAPUSNYA HUTANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM EFTY HINDARU SUDIBYO; Amin Purnawan
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1782

Abstract

Making of license process of roya mortgage right need the role of notary. The research Notary's role in the making of license deed of roya mortgage right because the debt elimination in perspective of legal certainty. The problem in this research  are 1) how did  the process of making Permit Roya Deed Rights due to debt removal, 2) notary role in making deed of Permit Roya Mortgage Rights due to the elimination of Debt in perspective of legal certainty and 3) what are  the Constraints and solutions in the role of notary in making the deed of Roya mortgage right due to the elimination of Debt in the perspective of legal certainty.Approach method used is juridical empirical method, juridical research with the object in the form of law, empirical research is the existence or results of research on the pouring of the applicable laws in the community.The result of this research is that the process of making Deed of Roya mortgage right due to debt removal is based on requests from interested parties and deletion based on the decision of the District Court. The role of a notary in the making of the deed of Roya mortgage right because of the elimination of Debt in the perspective of legal certainty is that roya can be processed if all the requirements are complete. One of them is Roya Letter. The problem is if the roya letter is lost or the certificate of mortgage is lost then the roya process can not be executed by the National Land Agency, then in this case the notary can help with the record in accordance with the rules of notary can issue or make Roya Permit or can be called as a roya concentrate in the form Notarial deed prior to the preparation of a loss report from the police to be issued a certificate of loss. The constraints of the notary's role in the making of the deed of Roya Hak Liability due to the elimination of Debt in the perspective of legal certainty are Roya period exceeds seven days from the date of application, Roya costs exceeds the provisions, Roya Partial Objects of Mortgage Rights which are Not Consist of Multiple Rights to Land and Completeness Roya Requirements Not Fulfilled. While the Solution to overcome the constraints in the role of notary in making the deed of Permit Roya mortgage right due to the elimination of Debt in the perspective of legal certainty is the Accuracy of Time In Roya Settlement Completion Settlement, Roya Rights Cost Assurance and Completeness of Roya Key words; Notary, Roya, Mortgage Right
PENERAPAN ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA PADA TESTAMENT YANG DIBUAT DI HADAPAN NOTARIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN Syaeful Bahri; Jawade Hafidz
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1777

Abstract

The research entitled The Application of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle In Testament Made Before Notary in Perspective of Justice has problem formulation: 1) How is the application of pacta sunt servanda principle on testaments made before the present notary ?, 2) What legal effect arises when The testamen made before the notary does not apply the principle of pacta sunt servanda in the perspective of justice? And 3) How is the application of pacta sunt servanda principle to testament made before Notary in the perspective of justice ?.The results of this research are 1) The application of pacta sunt servanda principle on testaments made before the present notary can be described that the implementation of pacta sunt servanda principle is required at all stages, either before, during or after the process of making the testament deed. 2) Any legal effect that arises when a testament made before a notary public does not apply the principle of pacta sunt servanda in the perspective of justice is that the testament is essentially a statement made unilaterally by the testamenter set forth in a deed that must be executed by the will . 3) The application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda to the testament made before the Notary in the perspective of justice is that in the making of this testament it must be adhered to two principles namely, firstly, giving equal rights and opportunities to the widest freedom of the broadest extent of equal freedom for each person. Second, able to reorganize the socio-economic disparities that occur so as to provide mutual benefits.Keywords: Pakta Azmen Sunt Servanda, Testament
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH NOTARIS TERHADAP PEMALSUAN AKTA OTENTIK DALAM JUAL BELI TANAH DI KABUPATEN REMBANG (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 05/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Rbg) Faizal Indra Nor Cahyo; Gunarto Gunarto
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1795

Abstract

In the sale and purchase of land rights of course there are various parties, including Sellers and Buyers. In this case, Seller (RJ) and Purchaser (IS) 1 purchased land on September 26, 2007 with 10 certificates and total purchase value of land object amounting to Rp 2.232.650.000, - (two billion two hundred thirty two million Six hundred fifty thousand rupiah), due on July 31, 2008, which is until the due date the Purchaser (IS) has not been able to repay it. On the other hand, the Notary of MJ who made the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement committed a Law Against Act (PMH) by issuing a Sale and Purchase Deed which should not be issued in case of non-payment. With the formulation of the problem studied are: 1. What are the legal consequences that occur on a Notary who commits an unlawful act against the Deed of Sale and Purchase Land made? 2. How to solve a case against a Notary who committed a Legal Actions (PMH) on the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land?Approach method used in this research is normative juridical research supported by empirical juridical, research specification is analytical descriptive, writer use primary data and secondary data to get data related to this research.Based on the results of this study, based on the Case Court's Decision Number 05 / Pdt.G / 2009 / PN.Rbg, the case investigation between the Seller (RJ) and the Buyer (IS) on the first issue of the formulation of Notary MJ because it was proven to Act Against Law Falsify the information contained in the Deed of Sale and Purchase which is different from the Deed of Sale and Purchase Bond that has been agreed by both parties, then he must finish the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement between the RJ and the IS, and automatically does not Occur And in the formulation of the problem Second, the Buyer (IS) who has made a default booking by not automatically paying the purchase price with the binding agreement between himself and the Seller (RJ), he is charged with a 13th Stipikat to Seller (RJ) discount, With the payment already given To Seller (RJ) by Buyer (IS) is irrevocable and automatically becomes the property of Seller (RJ). As well as Buyer (IS) are charged the court fees that have arisen in advance of the trial.The author's suggestion in this research is for the seller, should be more careful in choosing and revoking the prospective buyer, thus minimizing the undesirable things that will be done by the Buyers so as to disadvantage the Seller, for the buyer, he must have good faith It should always be upheld that there will be no future Seller, for Notary Public, Notary as a public official should have a Neutral attitude toward both parties in the agreement, can be mediator, law-abiding and not doing the Fight Against Act (PMH), by reason No party harmed. Keywords: Sale and Purchase Agreement, Unlawful Actions, Wanprestatie.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PRAKTEK PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIS DALAM HAL PENGHADAP MENGHADAP DALAM KURUN WAKTU DAN TEMPAT YANG BERBEDA Anny Mawartiningsih; Maryanto Maryanto
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1754

Abstract

Research on "Judicial Review of the Practice of Notarial Deed Making in the Facing Facing in Different Time and Place" aims to know and analyze the provisions or rules in authentic deed making by Notary in accordance with the applicable Law, the practice of making the deed in the case of confronting facing in, different time and place, and the validity of deeds made in, respects in different times and places. The approach of this study is sociological jurisdiction and data collection through literature study, observation and interview. Data analysis is done qualitatively.The provisions or rules in the authentic deed making by a notary shall in essence comply with the provisions of Articles 1867 and 1868 of the Civil Code, that authentic deeds as written evidence in the form as prescribed by law shall be made by or in the presence of a notary publicly authorized to manufacture an authentic deed in the place where the deed is made. In the making of authentic deed by the notary, the legislation referred to is the Law of Position Notary (UUJN). This is in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 to 7 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Position stating that the Notary Deed hereinafter referred to as Deed is an authentic deed made by or in the presence of Notary by form and procedures specified in the Law of Notary (UUJN). The practice of making the deed in the case of face-facing, different time and place occurs because of the reason for its practicality due to the limited time confrontation and / or the existence of the interest that can not be abandoned. In addition to the mutual trust of the parties so that hand over the aktanya management to other parties. The validity of a deed made in respect of faces facing different times and places is authenticated as an authentic deed as long as the deed is made in a notarial position and read and signed in the presence of the parties with at least two witnesses present, unless the parties wish the acts are not read out. If it is not met or the signing is done in different time and place then the deed has legal force as deed under the hand.Keywords: Notarial Deed, Encounter, Time and Place
PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH ABSENTE KARENA WARIS (STUDI KASUS DI KANTOR ATR/BPN KABUPATEN KENDAL YANG DOMISILI AHLI WARIS BERADA DILUAR WILAYAH KECAMATAN ) Ika Rahma Wanti; Munsyarif Abdul Chalim
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1790

Abstract

The law states that if a person has an excess of absent land then the land must be released or the sanction will be imposed. In fact, although this prohibition applies, the ownership or control of agricultural land in absente or drags is found in many sub-districts in kendal district, in the kendal district, there are many owners of agricultural land owned by persons or legal entities that are not only outside the kecamatan but sometimes Outside areas such as, Semarang city, and even those who are domiciled outside the province.The problems studied in this study are as follows: (1) how the concept of transition of absente land rights due to the heirs whose domicile heirs are outside the district area, (2) how the legal protection for the heirs of absente land owners who live outside District area.This study uses empirical juridical approach, empirical juridical approach in this research means that in analyzing the problem is done by combining legal materials (which is secondary data) with primary data obtained in the field.The results of this study indicate the following: (1) The ownership of Asbsentee land rights due to inheritance issues the right to the heirs to obtain the rights to the absentee land, and for the transition of absentee land to legal certainty, (2) Protection for the heirs of land owners Absentees residing outside the sub-district may occur if the inheritance has been in accordance with the legislation in the true sense of being the heir of the absentee landowner and the heirs residing outside the sub-district work on their own farmland.Keywords: Absente Land / Guntai, Heirs, Land Rights Transfer.
PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM AKTA HIBAH ATAS TANAH YANG TIDAK SAH KARENA MELEBIHI BAGIAN TERKECIL AHLI WARIS Ratnasari Ratnasari; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i2.1783

Abstract

A grant is a legal act of transfer of ownership that is deliberately given to another party. In Article 1682 of Civil Code states that the implementation of the grant is done by using an authentic deed. The finding of this research on the verdict of Klaten District Court no. 8 / Pdt. G / 2001 / PN.Klt, where the land grant with Grant Deed no. 387 / DLG / 23/1999 and Grant Deed no. 388 / DLG / 23/1999 dated 30 August 1999 which has been made by defendant I (Land grantee) is declared null and void because it is illegal (legal defect) and has no legal power to be used as evidence of land grant rights. The conclusion in this research is the consideration of the judge in civil suit case with case No.8 / PDT.G / 2001 / PN. Klt constituted by the Civil Code (BW) which states the Grant Deed No 387 / DLG / 23/1999 and the Grant Deed No. 388 / DLG / 23/1999 shall be declared to have no legal force and shall be void by law because they have no material evidentiary power.Keywords : Legal Problems, Authentic deed, The heir’s minimum right

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 26