cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Ius Humani. Law Journal
ISSN : 1390440X     EISSN : 13907794     DOI : -
Ius Humani Law Journal is a platform (iushumani.org) open to researchers around the world. It contains articles in all languages, where writers publish original studies on persons rights (natural, human or constitutional) and about the effective procedures for the protection of rights. The studies are viewed both form the philosophical perspective and the perspective of the fundamental juridical principles. Ius Humani’s purpose is the diffusion of knowledge, and the promotion of debate on different juridical perspectives.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 9 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 (2012)" : 9 Documents clear
Los paradigmas de redacción normativa como medio para alcanzar la seguridad: ¿una apuesta segura? Fernando Centenera Sánchez-Seco
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.296 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.48

Abstract

Different works concerned with the drafting of legislation consider that its language should be simple, clear and precise if it is to offer legal certainty. However legal certainty is understood, at first sight this position seems to be supported by numerous arguments, as when legal certainty is analyzed as a quality of law (in relation to accurate guidance, legal firmness and legal efficacy), as formal justice (with all that implies for liberty and equality) and as material justice (in relation, for example, to the protection of fundamental rights). However, on closer examination there also appear to be reasons for thinking that the stated paradigms for drafting do not always make for legal certainty and that in certain circumstances complex, vague or imprecise language may have its uses. That being so, the simplicity-clarity-precision guideline needs reformulating. To pursue this objective, a number of suggestive tools that may be applied to those circumstances are available in legislation theory. This paper advocates the implementation of a system of rationality which is capable of covering the diagnosed circumstances, a system organized into different levels of rationality where there would be room for both questions of language and of legal certainty.
Fines, valores y principios comunes a la propiedad intelectual, al derecho a la competencia y a otros derechos Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (186.701 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.32

Abstract

This paper aims the definition of which are the pourposes, values and common principles of intellectual property, competence law of advertising, consumer and information. It shows how the principles are anchored in values, and these in turn into rights purposes, making palpable the hierarchy such purposes, values ​​and principles have in the legal system. Thus, the outcome of the research is threefold: (i) definition of the purposes, values ​​and principles common to these areas of law, (ii) its interface, and (iii) their ranking.
Riofrío, J.C. & Marín Sevilla, M. (2012). Régimen de competencia. Quito: CEP Danilo Icaza Ortiz
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (89.237 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.34

Abstract

This paper is a review of the competition regime works of various authors, published under the auspices of the University of the Hemispheres and the Corporation for Studies and Publications. Analyzes the structure, the general concepts, case law taken for development. Includes comments on the usefulness of this work for the study of competition law and the contribution to the lawyers who want to practice in this branch of economic law.
El derecho a la verdad en el ámbito iberoamericano Luis Giancarlo Torreblanca Gonzales
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.167 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.26

Abstract

This paper persued to establish the origin of the Right to the Truth in Latin America, after this, it describes the statements issued by the American Court of Human Rights on this important right and its reception by the principles contained in the American Convention on Human Rights and as the scope that comes giving; this work concludes with a brief discussion of the reception they have had the judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Latinamerican Courts.
La regulación del derecho a la información pública en México Carlos Manuel Rosales García
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (254.612 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.35

Abstract

This paper exposes the legal nature and the usefulness of the right to information, is special in the case of Mexico. So it will be a study of the right to public information, in order to understand its origin and utility; then analyze the establishment and evolution in Mexican positive and discover its use as a mechanism for transparent use of public resources and the accountability of the State authorities.
Razón y democracia: La potencial renovación del concepto de aristocracia Pedro José Izquierdo
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (307.198 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.29

Abstract

This article studies the relationship between different kinds of discussion and the roles that they play in the diverse institutions of modern representative democracy. It distinguishes between three kinds of discussion: Platonic dialectic, deliberation, and democratic debate, and places them on a scale of decreasing attunement to rational standards of decision-making. It is argued that the more discussions are attuned to rational standards, the less democratic they become, because the less they are in sync with the mode of discussion that is proper to, and that in fact obtains in the demos. This tension between rational decision-making and democracy is identified as the tension between aristocracy and democracy as it was understood by the vast tradition of political philosophy, and suggests a way in which aristocracy may be reintroduced as a meaningful concept in modern constitutional thought. It is argued that only by acknowledging the existence of an aristocratic quality to rational decision-making is it possible to truly preserve the democratic character of representative institutions.
The Principle Of Reasonableness And Its Aplication To The Exam Of The Validity Of Laws Mauricio Maldonado Muñoz
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.458 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.40

Abstract

Este artículo aborda el principio de razonabilidad desde dos perspectivas. La primera que intenta explicar al derecho como orden en su contenido válido. La segunda, consecuencia de la primera, que usa el principio como método interpretativo para determinar la validez y constitucionalidad de las normas jurídicas, valiéndose de los subprincipios de adecuación, necesidad y proporcionalidad stricto sensu. A estos, en tanto son también juicios, les hemos sumado los de finalidad y de respeto al contenido esencial de los derechos, siguiendo la propuesta del profesor Sapag. En tanto la razonabilidad sirve de método interpretativo, se alude a ella en relación a la teoría del anticonflictivismo en los derechos fundamentales, que sostiene que no existen verdaderos conflictos de derechos y que, en realidad, dicha colisión se produce solamente entre intereses o pretensiones.
Nullity And Inexistence Of Legal Acts In Ecuadorian Law (II) César Coronel Jones; Óscar Del Brutto Andrade
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.611 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.30

Abstract

La inexistencia y la nulidad son instituciones fundamentales para el derecho privado ecuatoriano. Se trata de dos categorías distintas que tienen en común perseguir la ineficacia de los actos que no se formaron de acuerdo a los parámetros jurídicos. Tratándose de actos inexistentes, la ley los priva de toda consecuencia jurídica. Tratándose de actos nulos, la ley permite que un juez declare su invalidez y desconozca sus efectos. Este artículo revisa la regulación legal de la inexistencia y la nulidad en el derecho ecuatoriano, así como los pronunciamientos al respecto de la Corte Nacional de Justicia.
Análisis de la sentencia expedida por la Jueza 5a. de lo Civil en el caso "El Gran Hermano" Santiago Guarderas Izquierdo
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol 3 (2012)
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (226.043 KB) | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v3i0.46

Abstract

This article presents a brief analysis of the decision issued in the case known as “The Big Brother” with particular emphasis in the aspects in which the decision incurs in juridical errors. It departs from an objective revision which does not anticipate an opinion regarding the responsibility determined for defendants. On the contrary it is focused in those elements lessening merits to the decision and its grounds which are not consistent with the applicable juridical system, even independently from the main decision. Subjects such as the requirement of prejudication in matters of indemnity in case of damages derived from a crime, the nature of the liability of the co-perpetrator of a crime or quasi crime, the concept of the amount of repair in case of moral damages and its way of establishing the amount, the differences between moral damage and patrimonial damage and the necessity to use the method of carefully consideration in the events of conflict of rights are approached by the doctrine and jurisprudence with the occasion of the opinions issued by the judge trying the case in the decision. Even though the judgment was not executed since plaintiff abandoned the action, it disturbed the judicial spheres because of the litigating parties: the President of the Republic and two journalists.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9