cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ari Septian
Contact Email
ariseptian@unsur.ac.id
Phone
+628121428312
Journal Mail Official
ariseptian@unsur.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, FKIP Universitas Suryakancana Jalan Dr. Muwardi Komplek Pasir Gede Raya Cianjur 43216
Location
Kab. cianjur,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
PRISMA
Published by Universitas Suryakancana
ISSN : 20893604     EISSN : 26144611     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v9i2
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Mathematics Social Sciences
This journal focuses on mathematics education and disciplined inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics. The scope of the journal are: Mathematics Learning Model, Media Learning Mathematics, Curriculum in Mathematics Teaching, Assessment and Evaluation in Mathematics Teaching, Ethnomatics in Mathematics Learning, Design Didactical in Mathematics Learning, Lesson Study in Mathematics Learning
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA" : 14 Documents clear
The Role of Self-Efficacy in Enhance Metacognitive and Academic Performance Through Problem-Solving Anggraini, Elisa; Subanji, Subanji; Rahardjo, Swasono
PRISMA Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i2.4382

Abstract

This research analyzes the role of self-efficacy in enhancing metacognitive and academic performance of students through problem-solving as learning process. Researchers research some students from senior high school in Malang. This research uses mixed methods with surveys, interviews, and analysis of students’ learning outcomes. At the first meeting, students were asked to fill survey about the dimensions of self-efficacy, which are magnitude, strength, and generality. Moreover, researchers interviewed students to explore their metacognitive activities that they do, such as awareness, regulation, and evaluation. After that, researchers analyze their learning outcomes to determine their academic performance. This research result shows that students with a high dimension of self-efficacy tend to show better metacognitive activity than the other. Furthermore, students with a high dimension of self-efficacy tend to show better academic performance than others.
Investigating Numeracy Skills: How Students Handle Data Representation Challenges Puspitasari, Septi; Anwar, Lathiful; Sa'dijah, Cholis
PRISMA Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i2.4161

Abstract

Adequate numeracy skills are essential, yet many students still face difficulties in solving numeracy problems. Previous studies have indicated that one of the challenges encountered by students relates to the representation of data or information in the problems to be solved. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore how students with various levels of numeracy skills address these obstacles in problem solving. The method used is descriptive with a qualitative approach, and data collection techniques include triangulation of test results and interviews. The research subjects are 30 eighth- grade students at one of the public junior high schools in Malang Regency. The results obtained show that students at a proficient level can represent data using mathematical expressions (creating patterns), capable students can represent data with words or written text, whereas students at the basic level still struggle with representing data due to difficulties in connecting available information, though they can read the charts presented. Students requiring special intervention are still unable to represent data from the graphs presented, and they also have difficulties in reading and finding information from graphs. Some students still struggle with writing mathematical arguments and reading information, and are not accustomed to contextual problems. Thus, it is advisable for teachers to familiarize students by providing numeracy problems, both PISA or AKM types
Students' Errors in Understanding Numeracy Problems:A Case Study of Kinesthetic Students Mahardika, Candra; Anwar, Lathiful; Kusumasari, Vita
PRISMA Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i2.4265

Abstract

Numeracy is an essential skill that needs to be developed early on. With good numeracy skills, students are expected to be able to solve problems that occur in everyday life. However, not all students are able to solve problems in the form of numeracy well, one of which is students with kinesthetic learning styles. This is because numeracy problems are presented in visual form, which is not in accordance with the kinesthetic students, who more easily process information physically or through movement. Therefore, kinesthetic students tend to make many mistakes in solving numeracy problems. Therefore, the researcher intends to analyze the errors made by kinesthetic students in solving numeracy problems in order to help teachers find solutions to these problems. This qualitative study involved private junior high school students in Malang city with kinesthetic learning styles as research subjects. Researchers used learning style test questionnaires, numeracy problem test results, and interview results to obtain data, which were then analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion/verification. Based on the study's results, it was found that kinesthetic students made three types of errors in solving numeracy problems, namely 1) errors in understanding the problem, 2) errors in understanding the problem, and 3) errors in solving numeracy problems. These errors are caused by several things, including 1) students' lack of ability to interpret the reading, 2) students' lack of willingness to reread the problems presented, 3) the numeracy problems presented are complicated, i.e. presented with many numbers and objects, 4) students tend to rush to solve the problems so they do not do the reexamination process.
Analysis of Computational Thinking Ability of High School Students in Solving Statistics problems Swasto, Widya; Suanto, Elfis; Saragih, Sehatta
PRISMA Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jp.v13i2.4373

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of computational thinking skills in 21st century learning. This research aims to describe the computational thinking skills of high school students in solving problems on statistics material. This research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach. The subject of the research was class X students of SMA Negeri 7 Pekanbaru, Pekanbaru City as many as 25 students. The data collection technique was done by test and interview. The analysis of students' computational thinking ability is seen through the indicators of computational thinking. The results of the analysis showed that high ability students on decomposition indicators (95.83%) were in the excellent category, on pattern recognition indicators (79.17%) abstraction (79.17%) were in the good category, and on algorithm thinking indicators (66.67%) were in the sufficient category. Medium ability students on decomposition indicators (72.22%) and pattern recognition (63.89%) are in the good category, on abstraction indicators (58.33%) in the sufficient category, and on algorithm thinking indicators (33.33%) are in the low category. Low ability students in the decomposition indicator (55%) are in the sufficient category, low category for the pattern recognition indicator (22.5%) and very low category for the abstraction indicator (17.5%) and thinking algorithm (7.5%).

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2025): PRISMA Vol 14, No 1 (2025): PRISMA Vol 13, No 2 (2024): PRISMA Vol 13, No 1 (2024): PRISMA Vol 12, No 2 (2023): PRISMA Vol 12, No 1 (2023): PRISMA Vol 11, No 2 (2022): PRISMA Volume 11, No 2 Tahun 2022 Vol 11, No 1 (2022): PRISMA Volume 11, No 1 Tahun 2022 Vol 10, No 2 (2021): PRISMA Volume 10 No 2 Tahun 2021 Vol 10, No 1 (2021): PRISMA Volume 10, No 1 Tahun 2021 Vol 9, No 2 (2020): PRISMA Volume 9, No 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 9, No 1 (2020): PRISMA Volume 9, No 1 Tahun 2020 Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Jurnal PRISMA Volume 8, No 2 tahun 2019 Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Jurnal PRISMA Volume 8, No 1 tahun 2019 Vol 7, No 2 (2018): Jurnal PRISMA Volume VII, No 2 tahun 2018 Vol 7, No 1 (2018): Jurnal PRISMA Volume VII, No 1 tahun 2018 Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Jurnal PRISMA Volume VI, No 2 tahun 2017 Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Jurnal PRISMA Volume VI, No 1 tahun 2017 More Issue