cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
Published by Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 22 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue " Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018" : 22 Documents clear
Endoglin Expression (CD105) in Ephithelial Ovarian Cancer Jumsa, Rizkinov; Rambulangi, John; Arifuddin, Sharvianty; Miskad, Upik
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (107.694 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i2.801

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Endoglin ( CD105 ) is one of the factors that play a role in vascular development , angiogenesis and vascular homeostasis. The aim of this research is to address the endoglin expression (CD105) in primary tumor and metastasis tumor (omentum) and their relation with clinicopathological factor: stadium, differentiation level, and histological epithelial ovarian cancer. Method: The research was performed at Public Service Hall of Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and educational networking hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology Departement of Medical Faculty Hasanuddin University Makassar. The research design is cross sectional with 55 samples consisting of 55 samples of primary tumor and 55 matastasis tumor. Imunohistochemistry examination was performed to all samples. Result:The results show a significant relation between endoglin (CD105) at omentum metastasis tumor and stadium and cell differentiation level of epithelial ovarian cancer. There is no significant relation between endoglin (CD105) expression at primary tumor of ovarian cancer and stadium and differentiation and type of histopathological cell. In addition, there is no significant relation between endoglin expression (CD105) at omentum metastasis tumor and type of histophatological cell of ovarian cancer. There is a significant correlation (strong category) between endoglin expression at omentum metastasis tumor and endoglin expression at primary tumor of epithelial ovarian cancer. Conclusion: Endoglin expression in ovarian cancer metastatic tumor to omentum is correlated to clinical stage and differentiation level of ovarian cancer. And endoglin is one of the pro angiogenic and pro metastasis factors. Keywords:epithelial ovarian cancer, endoglin expression, CD105, immunohistochemistry  
How Long is the Safest InterDelivery Interval in Women with Previous History of Cesarean Delivery? Santoso, Budi I; Surya, Raymond; Firdaus, Karina K; Hakim, Surahman
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (169.652 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i2.764

Abstract

  Objective: To investigate the association between interdelivery interval and uterine rupture in women with previous CD.   Methods: The formulation question was how long is the safest interdeliveryinterval to minimalize the risk of uterine rupture. Theauthors investigated in three databases including Pubmed,Cochrane, and Embase database. Inclusion criteria wereabstract answering the clinical question, written in Englishlanguage, and full-text paper availability.   Results: One systematic review, six cohort studies, and 1 casecontrolstudy were collected to compare the inter-pregnancyinterval to the risk of uterine rupture. The author retrievedseven articles suitable to the inclusion criteria after excluding tenarticles screened by the abstract and language. Then, the authoradded one article used in the systematic review. Hence, the criticalappraisal based on Validity, Importance, and Applicability (VIA)was performed for eight articles.   Conclusion: The inter-delivery interval 18 months is the safest time to avoid uterine rupture. Prostaglandin analogue induction should be avoided and for patients with a history of past cesarean using a single-layer closure to be educated about the increased risk. Keywords: cesarean delivery, inter-delivery interval, uterine rupture,vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 22

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 4 October2025 Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue