cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
Published by Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 44 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018" : 44 Documents clear
Conformity of Human Papillomavirus between Self-examination of Vaginal Fluid and Cervical Specimen with Fluid-Based Cytology in Precancerous Lesions: Tingkat Kesesuaian Human Papillomavirus antara Pemeriksaan Cairan Vagina secara Mandiri dan Spesimen Serviks dengan Sitologi Berbasis Cairan pada Lesi Prakanker Rahmawaty Anwar; Syahrul Rauf; Eddy R. Moeljono
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (85.627 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i4.851

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To determine the conformity of human papillomavirus between self-examination of vaginal specimen and cervical specimen with fluid-based cytology in precancerous lesions. Methods: A cross-sectional study performed on cervical and vaginal fluid from 90 pre-cancerous lesions patients from April to September 2016. Cytological examination performed with self-examination and liquid-based cytology technique. HPV genotyping performed with PCR technique. Data were analyzed with SPSS. Results: Most of the women aged >35 years (89%), 78% (71/90) multiparity and 74.4% (67/90) do not know about HPV screening. High risk type found in both vaginal and cervical fluid was type 16, 18, 33 and 45 whereas type 35 found only in vaginal fluid. The most prevalent high-risk HPV for both specimens were type 16 and 18. HPV type 42 and 53 were the low risk HPV found in the vaginal and cervical specimens (table 2). Cohen’s kappa for inter-test agreement shows a strong correlation (r=0.864). Conclusion: The HPV self-examination method can be used as a primary examination of cervical cancer lesions detection in addition to fluid-based cytology with the similar results. Keywords: Human papillomavirus, self-examination, fluid-based cytology, cervical cancer Abstrak Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui tingkat kesesuaian antara pemeriksaan HPV mandiri dari spesimen vagina dan hasil pemeriksaan sitologi berbasis cairan dari spesimen serviks. Metode: Penelitian cross-sectional dilakukan pada cairan serviks dan vagina dari 90 pasien lesi pra-kanker pada April sampai September 2016. Pemeriksaan sitologi dilakukan dengan pemeriksaan diri dan teknik sitologi berbasis cairan. Pemeriksaan genotip HPV dilakukan dengan teknik PCR. Data dianalisis dengan SPSS. Hasil: Sebagian besar wanita dalam penelitian iniaberusia >35 tahun (89%), 78% (71/90) multiparitas dan 74,4% (67/90) tidak mengetahui tentang skrining HPV. Tipe HPV risiko tinggi yang ditemukan pada cairan vagina dan serviks adalah tipe 16, 18, 33 dan 45 sedangkan tipe 35 hanya ditemukan pada cairan vagina. Tipe HPV risiko tinggi yang dominan untuk kedua spesimen adalah tipe 16 dan 18. HPV tipe 42 dan 53 adalah HPV risiko rendah yang ditemukan pada baik spesimen vagina maupun serviks. Kappa Cohen untuk tingkat kesesuaian antara pemeriksaan mandiri dan sitologi berbasis cairan menunjukkan korelasi kuat (r = 0,864). Kesimpulan: Metode pemeriksaan HPV secara mandiri sendiri dapat digunakan sebagai pemeriksaan primer deteksi lesi kanker serviks selain sitologi berbasis cairan dengan hasil yang sama.
Post-operative Recovery Assessment of Urinary Tract Dysfunction Following Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Patients: Kajian Pemulihan Fungsi Berkemih pada Pasien Kanker Serviks Pascahisterektomi Radikal Laila Nuranna; Sang A F Adi Kusuma
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (91.495 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i4.852

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To assess the length of recovery phase in urinary tract dysfunction following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer patients in Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital. Methods: This survey study was conducted in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from September 2016 to May 2017. Subjects were cervical cancer patients from stage IA2 to IIA2 underwent radical hysterectomy. Suprapubic catheter (SPC) was inserted to observe the urine production after procedure. Patients were then directed for bladder training protocol involving clamping and opening SPC. Sensation of bladder fullness followed by spontaneous micturition were recorded. Measurement of post voiding residual (PVR) urine volume after spontaneous micturition until less than 100 mL was considered as resolution of urinary tract dysfunction. The average days of every achieved phase were then calculated. Results: Twenty-nine subjects underwent radical hysterectomy during observation period. But only 21 subjects continued the bladder training protocol and recorded for the recovery phases. The average time needed to obtain sensation of bladder fullness and spontaneous micturition were 7.57 ± 4.78 days (median 5 days, minimum 3 days, maximum 22 days)and 8 ± 5.21 days (median 6 days, minimum 3 days, maximum 23 days). The objective PVR urine became less than 100mL was obtained after 21.42 ± 18 days (median 18 days, minimum 7 days, maximum 74 days). Conslusion: Following radical hysterectomy, recording the recovery phase of urinary tract dysfuction is essential to ensure complete resolution. Complete resolution of the urinary dysfunction is achieved after 21.42±18 days in average (median 18 days, minimum 7 days, maximum 74 days). Keywords: cervical cancer, radical hysterectomy, urinary tract dysfunction, post voiding residual volume. Abstrak Tujuan: Menilai masa pemulihan disfungsi saluran kemih setelah histerektomi radikal pada pasien kanker serviks di RSUPN Ciptomangunkusumo. Metode: Studi survei dilakukan di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo dari September 2016 hingga Mei 2017. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari pasien kanker serviks stadium IA2 hingga IIA2 yang menjalani histerektomi radikal. Kateter suprapubik (SPC) digunakan sebagai alat untuk memantau produksi urin pasca operasi. Pasien diinstruksikan untuk mengikuti protokol bladder training yaitu melalui prosedur menutup dan membuka kateter. Rasa sensasi ingin berkemih dan berkemih spontan. Pengukuran residu volume urin pasca berkemih dibawah 100mL dianggap merupakan indikator pemulihan disfungsi saluran kemih. Rata-rata hari dari setiap fase kemudian dihitung. Hasil: Dua puluh sembilan subjek didapatkan selama penelitian. Namun, hanya 21 subjek yang dapat mengikuti protocol bladder traning dan dicatat perkembangan pemulihannya. Rata-rata hari yang diperlukan untuk merasakan sensasi berkemih dan berkemih spontan adalah 7,57 ± 4.78 hari (median 5 hari, minimum 3 hari, dan maksimum 22 hari) dan 8 ± 5.21 hari. (median 6 hari, minimum 3 hari dan maksimum 23 hari) Rata-rata hari untuk mencapai residu urin di bawah 100 mL adalah 21.42 ± 18 (median 18 hari, minimum 7 hari, dan maksimum 74 hari). Kesimpulan: Setelah prosedur histerektomi radikal, pencatatan masa pemulihan penting untuk dipantau untuk memastikan pemulihan lengkap. Rata-rata hari yang diperlukan untuk pemulihan adalah 21.42 ± 18 hari (median 18 hari, minimum 7 hari, dan maksimum 74 hari). Kata kunci: kanker serviks, histerektomi radikal, disfungsi saluran kemih, volume residu paska berkemih.
How to Recognize, Prevent and Address Complications of Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: Mengenali, Mencegah dan Mengatasi Komplikasi Operasi Ginekologi Laparoskopi cepi T Pramayadi; Erliana Fani
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.523 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i4.896

Abstract

AbstractObjective: to highlight the needs of awareness on recognizing, prevent and address complications in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.Method: Literature reviewDiscussion: The complications of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery mainly can be classified as complications related to anesthesia, entry technique, electrosurgical, postoperative and visceral due to surgical procedure itself. Lam proposed a 6 phase-based classification of laparoscopic surgery complications; patient identification, anesthesia and positioning, abdominal entry and port placement, surgery, postoperative recovery and counselling. The aim of this classification is to promote a culture risk management to improve patient safety and outcome. Each and every phase above should be able to assessed, analyzed and executed properly to prevent complications. Conclusion: Complication in operative laparoscopy is generally minor and can be handled successfully. However, although very rare, major complications are detrimental to the patient. It also becomes heavy burden for the surgeons. Preventive measures should be implemented not only by the operator but also the anesthesiologist, and theatre practitioners. Systematic drills, which regularly re rehearsed is important in order to maintain team proficiencies. Keywords: complications, gynecologic laparoscopy, operative Laparoscopy Abstrak Tujuan: Untuk menekankan pentingnya mengenali, mencegah dan mengatasi secara dini komplikasi operasi laparoskopi ginekologi. Metode: Kajian pustaka Diskusi : Komplikasi operasi ginekologi laparoskopi dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi komplikasi yang berhubungan dengan anestesi, teknik masuknya trokar utama, terkait elektro surgikal, komplikasi pascaoperasi dan komplikasi visera (pembuluh darah, usus, cedera traktus urinarius) terkait tindakan operasi itu sendiri. Lam mengusulkan suatu klasifikasi berbasis fase, antara lain, identifikasi pasien, anestesi dan posisi pasien, akses masuk abdomen dan penempatan trokar, terkait operasi, pemulihan pascaoperasi dan konseling. Tujuan dari klasifikasi ini adalah untuk meningkatkan budaya sadar risiko,guna meningkatkan keselamatan pasien. Setiap tahap harus dapat dilaksanakan, dinilai dan dianalisis dengan baik untuk mencegah terjadinya komplikasi. Kesimpulan: Komplikasi pada operasi ginekologi laparoskopi umumnya ringan dan dapat ditangani dengan baik. Walaupun jarang terjadi, komplikasi berat umumnya sangat merugikan pasien dan menjadi beban operator. Langkah-langkah pencegahan ini harus dilaksanakan oleh operator, tim anestesi serta seluruh tim kamar operasi. Simulasi harus dilaksanakan, guna mempertahankan kecakapan tim Kata kunci : komplikasi, laparoskopi ginekologi, laparoskopi operatif
Born too Early, Where are We Now? T. Joewono, Hermanto
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (63.024 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v6i4.936

Abstract

n/a

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 44

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 4 October2025 Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue