cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
Published by Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016" : 13 Documents clear
Epidemiology Data of Ovarian Cancer in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Fransisca Noela; Kartiwa H Nuryanto
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (104.844 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i2.84

Abstract

Objective: To describe the incidence of ovarian cancer and its characteristic in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in the last 5 years. Method: This was cross sectional study design. The data was collected from Gynecology Oncology Division Cancer Registry and Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital medical record from January 2009 to December 2013; follow up was performed to know the 4-years survival rate. Result: There were 98 subjects in this study. The majority incidence of ovarian cancer was 45-54 years old (33.6%); the incidence of ovarian cancer decreased with the increased number of parity; the majority histotype was epithelial (76.5%); and most of them were diagnosed on advanced stage (55.1%). The 4-year survival rate for epithelial type was 77%; germinal type was 83.3%; and stromal type was 100%. Based on therapy, the 4-year survival rate was 84.1% for surgical only; 83.3% in adjuvant chemotherapy group; and 68.4% in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the group of adjuvant chemotherapy, there was 63% patients with complete response and 41.2% patients with complete response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: The highest incidence of ovarian cancer in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital belongs to the age of reproductive women (≤ 55 years old) with the highest incidence occurs in nulliparity women. Most of the ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in advanced stage (stage III-IV). [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 4-2: 101-106] Keywords: age, histotype, ovarian cancer, parity, response, stage, survival, treatment
Mesothelin versus Ca125 in Screening the Ovarian Malignancy Meliana Jayasaputra; Freddy W Wagey; Max R Rarung
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (101.787 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i2.85

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of mesothelin compared with Ca-125 as a tumor marker in predicting ovarian malignancy. Method: The cross sectional study design with diagnostic tests was conducted in 30 samples of patients undergoing elective laparotomy due to ovarian tumor. We compared the sensitivity and specificity between mesothelin and Ca-125, then the data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22.0. Result: According to the ROC curve analysis, optimal sensitivity and specificity value of mesothelin was 63.2% and 54.5% at a cut-off point of 0.45 pg/ml; or 42.1% and 72.7% at a cut-off point of 0.55 pg/ml. While the value of both optimal sensitivity and specificity of Ca-125 was 73.7% and 63.6% at a cut-off point of 46.63 U/ml. Conclusion: Mesothelin and Ca-125 are not different significantly for the AUC value of 50%. Due to higher sensitivity and specificity of Ca-125 than mesothelin, Ca-125 is still used as tumor marker for screening the ovarian malignancy. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 4-2: 107-110] Keywords: Ca-125, mesothelin, ovarian malignancy
The Outcomes of Primary Debulking Surgery and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Dino Rinaldy; Andrijono Andrijono; Bambang Sutrisna
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.211 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i2.86

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes and survival rate of primary debulking surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Method: We selected advanced ovarian cancer patients from medical records. Subjects were allocated into groups of primary debulking surgery and neoajuvant chemotherapy by considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We analyzed the data using T test, Fisher’s exact, and chi-square. The survival rate was presented in Kaplan Meier curve, whereas the significance was tested with Logrank. We managed the data using STRATA software version 12. Result: We obtained 32 cases of primary debulking surgery group and 20 cases of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. Most of the subjects (44.2%) were 40-49 years old and 80.8% had delivered more than twice. The mean value of Ca-125 at admission was 3,594.8 u/ml (range 66.6 to 73,000 u/ml). Total of 31 subjects showed the serous histologic type (59.6%). There was no association between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the parameter of operative time, blood loss, organs injury, ICU stay, and hospital stay (p>0.05). Primary debulking surgery had a survival rate similar to neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (p=0.95). Conclusion: The perioperative outcomes of advanced ovarian cancer patients has similar result between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary debulking surgery has a survival rate similar to neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 4-2: 111-115] Keywords: advanced ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primary debulking surgery

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue