cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yaktiworo Indriani
Contact Email
editor.jiia@fp.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6285269027745
Journal Mail Official
editor.jiia@fp.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 26204177     EISSN : 26204177     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v12i2.8948
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science is published by the Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, in collaboration with PERHEPI, the Indonesian Agricultural Economist Association. The first printed Journal was published in 2013 and the online version started in May 2018 edition. The scopes include agribusiness, agricultural economics, agricultural development, rural sociology, agricultural extension, food security, and other subjects related to agriculture and society. This Journal is published four times a year, February, May, August, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 3 (2013)" : 14 Documents clear
Panduan Penulisan JIIA 2013 Tim Pengelola JIIA
Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (29.597 KB) | DOI: 10.23960/jiia.v1i3.571

Abstract

EFISIENSI PRODUKSI DAN PENDAPATAN USAHATANI TEMBAKAU DI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG TIMUR Erzia Estariza; Fembriarti Erry Prasmatiwi; Hurip Santoso
Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (164.635 KB) | DOI: 10.23960/jiia.v1i3.582

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the production’s efficiency of tobacco in East Lampung Regency, determine the factors that influence the technical efficiency of tobacco farm in East Lampung Regency, and determine the amount of tobacco farming income in East Lampung Regency. The research was conducted in proposive selected two districts, namely Batanghari Nuban and Purbolinggo of East Lampung Regency. The samples were drawn from the population by simple random design, resulted a total sample of 60 tobacco’s farmers. The analyses used in this research were descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysis. The first purpose was answered by using frontier production function, the second by multiple linear regression analysis and the third by employing income analysis. The results showed that tobacco farming in East Lampung Regency was not technically efficient, technical efficiency of farming in East Lampung Regency was 73,85%. The factors that influence significantly in technical efficiency of tobacco farm in East Lampung Regency was farming experience, formal education, counseling frequency and spacing of tobacco. Tobacco farming in East Lampung Regency was  profitable because it had a value of  R/C=1.85 and income Rp20,934,062.12 per hectar. Keywords: efficiency, frontier, income, tobacco farming
PENDAPATAN DAN KESEJAHTERAAN PETANI PADI ORGANIK PESERTA SEKOLAH LAPANGAN PENGELOLAAN TANAMAN TERPADU (SL-PTT) DI KECAMATAN PAGELARAN KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU Putri, Tika Leoni; Hepiana Lestari, Dyah Aring; Nugraha, Adia
Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (149.748 KB) | DOI: 10.23960/jiia.v1i3.577

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to determine the level of income and profits of organic rice farming SL-PTT participants, determine the level of household income SL-PTT participants, determine the level of welfare household SL-PTT participants in the District of Pagelaran of Pringsewu Regency. This research was conducted in Pagelaran and Gemah Ripah villages of Pagelaran District. The research samples were drawn from the population by simple random design.  The total samples were 77 farmers consisted of 37 SL-PTT participants and 40 SL-PTT non-participants. The data was analyzed by farm income analysis, household income analysis and welfare analysis based on Sajogyo’s criteria (1997). The results showed that the average of income SL-PTT participants based on cash costs and total cost were Rp11,510,16.35 dan Rp13,047,112.84 and acceptance ratios obtained by cost (R/C ratio) in cash and in total were 4.69 and 3.27.  Average income of SL-PTT non participants based on cash costs and total cost were Rp9,803,268.59 and Rp8,418,819.09 and acceptance ratios obtained by cost (R/C ratio) and total cash were 3.7 and 2.68.  Averages household income of SL-PTT participants was Rp39,174,915.54 per year. Averages household income of SL-PTT non-participants was Rp36,978,219 per year. Based on Sajogyo’s criteria, there was one of household SL-PTT paricipant that was classified as moderate household and  three of household SL-PTT non participants were classified as moderate household. Keywords: household, income, organic rice, SL-PTT, welfare
POLA KEMITRAAN CONTRACT FARMING ANTARA PETANI CLUSTER DAN PT MITRATANI AGRO UNGGUL (PT MAU) DI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG SELATAN Azhari Maliki; R Hanung Ismono; Helvi Yanfika
Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis: Journal of Agribusiness Science Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (117.585 KB) | DOI: 10.23960/jiia.v1i3.572

Abstract

This research aimed to know the partnership pattern of contract farming between cluster farmers and PT Mitratani Agro Unggul and the partnership benefits for the farmers.  This research was conducted in South Lampung Regency in October 2012, in which 12 farmers joined this partnership program as respondents.  The data was analyzed by descriptive and farming income analysis.  The results showed that the related partners to contract farming partnership covered: capital assistance, marketing, and knowledge transfer support or trainings.  The contract farming was an official partnership containing the rules in the written contracts of agreement.  The partnership of contract farming had not economically given benefit to the cluster of pepper farmers, because of the low of farmers’ productivities. These low productivities were caused by several problems, such as climate, cultivation technic, bug’s infections, and also lending taradinnes.  The highest R/C was 1.25 and the lowest R/C was 1.01.  Farmers also got non-economically benefits; one of those was the existence of legal law microfinance institution and improvement of the derivative products of chili pepper. Keywords: cluster, chili pepper, contract farming, partnership

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 1 (2025) Vol 12, No 4 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 4 (2024) Vol 12, No 3 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024) Vol 12, No 2 (2024) Vol 12, No 1 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024) Vol 11, No 4 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2023) Vol 11, No 2 (2023) Vol 11, No 1 (2023) Vol 10, No 4 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2022) Vol 10, No 2 (2022) Vol 10, No 1 (2022) Vol 9, No 4 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 1 (2021) Vol 8, No 4 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2020) Vol 8, No 2 (2020) Vol 8, No 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 4 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 4 (2018) Vol 6, No 4 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 4 (2017) Vol 5, No 4 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 4 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 4 (2015) Vol 3, No 4 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2015) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 4 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 4 (2013) Vol 1, No 4 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue