cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Raden Herdian Bayu Ash Siddiq
Contact Email
jitter@widyatama.ac.id
Phone
+62227275855
Journal Mail Official
jitter@widyatama.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Cikutra no 204 A Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
JITTER (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan)
Published by Universitas Widyatama
ISSN : 26860333     EISSN : 24073911     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33197/jitter.vol4.iss3.2018.16
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Mechanical Engineering
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan (JITTER) adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Universitas Widyatama, Bandung. Jurnal ini diterbitkan sebagai wahana sosialisasi dan diseminasi hasil penelitian bagi kalangan akademisi maupun masyarakat luas, pada bidang teknologi informasi dan terapannya. Bidang kajian dicakup meliputi sistem informasi, ilmu komputer, jaringan komputer, basis data, kecerdasan buatan, juga beberapa bidang teknik lainnya seperti Teknik Sipil, Teknik Mesin, Teknik Elektro dan Teknik Industri.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Komputer (semua kategori) - Ilmu Komputer (Lain-Lain)
Articles 24 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)" : 24 Documents clear
ANALISIS SAFETY FACTOR BH 915 DENGAN PEMBEBANAN RM 1921 DAN EKSISTING TERHADAP DESAIN AWAL JEMBATAN Dicky Arisikam; Heru Kuswanto; Muhammad Arifudin; Trina Marlina Nurochima
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan (JITTER) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Widyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33197/jitter.vol9.iss2.2023.1076

Abstract

BH 915 is a two-span bridge located at km 396+427 between Stasiun Muaraenim-MuaralawaiDivre III Palembang. The span length of the bridge is 25 m and 50 m with the initial design based on RMBukit Asam. Each bridge will experience a decrease in condition due to increasing age, operating expenses, and environmental conditions. This degradation analysis cannot only be carried out with inspection procedures that produce qualitative values, but also requires quantitative values. Therefore, in the discussion of this paper, it discusses the analysis of the value of the safety factor on the BH 915 bridge due to loading with a combination of dead load and live load in the form of RM 1921 and Existing with a comparison to the initial design of the bridge using RM Bukit Asam loading.From the results of the analysis, BH 915 with a span of 25 m under normal conditions has a safety factor value of 0.91 when loaded with RM 1921, 1.25when loaded with locomotives, 1.58 when loaded with locomotives, and 1.92 when loaded with carriages. BH 915 with a span of 50 m under normal conditions has a safety factor value of 0.89 when loaded with RM 1921, 1.31 when loaded with locomotives, 1.71when loaded with locomotives, and 1.96 when loaded with carriages. When it is assumed that the quality ofthe bridge is reduced by 25% (moment increases by 25%), the value of the safety factor has decreased by 20%.
ANALISIS FAKTOR KEAMANAN PADA JEMBATAN KERETA API BH NOMOR 105 KM 49+093 ANTARA STASIUN LUBUKALUNG DAN STASIUN SICINCIN DI DIVRE 2 SUMATERA BARAT Dicky Arisikam; Heru Kuswanto; Muhammad Arifudin; Alya Ramadianisa
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan (JITTER) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Widyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33197/jitter.vol9.iss2.2023.1077

Abstract

One of the structures on various railroads, of which is a bridge. On the railway bridge, there are calculated loads. The load is divided into three, namely the girder self-load, additional dead load, and live load. Locomotives and wain have different axle loads and axle distances, so there is a change in the forces acting on the rail structure. Currently, the planned train loading is based on the 1921 Load Plan (RM) scheme. On the bridge BH No. 105 which connects Lubukalung Station with Sicincin is passed by BB 303 locomotive and closed wain, loading analysis is carried out by making axle loads and axle distances on a span of 50 m. Then we can compare the calculation of the load with the RM 1921 and RM Sumbar scheme, it is necessary to check the capacity of the entire bridge structure against the applicable loading. Obtained the value of the calculation of the safety factor of the existing loading with the RM 1921 scheme for a maximum reaction is 2,353 and a maximum moment is 2,32. With the RM Sumbar scheme, a maximum reaction is 0.8365 and a maximum moment is 0.74125. This shows the achievement of a safety factor of more than 1.5 for the calculation of the safety factor of the existing loading with the RM 1921 scheme. While the maximum displacement safety factor value for the RM 1921 scheme is 0.005, West Sumatra RM 0.005, and the existing charge is 0.0667. Based on the calculation results, it is smaller than the maximum safety factor value that meets the requirements.
BIM SEBAGAI ALAT MANAGEMENT ASET : USULAN TINGKAT LOD DARI PEKERJAAN DIGITASI DAN VALIDASI PENGUKURAN ASSET PT.KAI Dicky Arisikam; Heru Kuswanto; Muhammad Arifudin; Azwar Azwar
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan (JITTER) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Widyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33197/jitter.vol9.iss2.2023.1078

Abstract

The station is one of the important assets because passengers must access the station before boarding the train and must leave the station after arriving at their final destination. TTA is a unit that has one of the main tasks, namely collecting data, recording, validating, evaluating and controlling data on the Station Building assets. The main challenge in implementing an asset management strategy for buildings lies in the many types of assets that must be analyzed and categorized. Therefore, by adopting digital tools such as BIM, practitioners can improve the consistency of building information, computing capabilities, and coordination capabilities in managing assets. In the early stages, LOD is needed to determine the number and level of building information that needs to be placed in the BIM Model.The topic that will be presented in this paper is about proposing an LOD framework for station buildings managed by BUMN PT. Kereta Api Indonesia so as to improve the quality of asset management. Based on the research results, LOD contains 2 (two) key levels to identify a station building so that the resulting information becomes more structured when we want to build a BIM model. The first level is a component that is divided into several indicators such as roof components, walls, floors, doors, windows, ventilation, platforms, overcaping, rails, lighting and plumbing. The second level is elements which are divided into several descriptors such as geometry, position, dimensions, type, elevation, material, and finishing. So this paper proposes the LOD level to be applied to BIM so that it can explain station buildings from a simple model (LOD-S.KA. 0) to a detailed model (LOD-S.KA.4)
Daftar Isi, Halaman Dewan Redaksi dan Halaman Pengantar Raden Herdian Bayu Ash Shiddiq
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan (JITTER) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Widyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Daftar Isi, Halaman Dewan Redaksi dan Halaman Pengantar

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021) Vol 7 No 3 (2021) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2016) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014) More Issue