cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2548804X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
IJoLCAS accepts scientific contributions on the following topics: life cycle assessment, life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment, life cycle sustainability assessment, social life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, environmental footprint, carbon footprint, water footprint, land footprint, chemical footprint, life cycle perspective/thinking/approach in environmental management system, life cycle engineering, input-output analysis, substance and material flow analysis, industrial ecology, and circular economy.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 1 (2019)" : 7 Documents clear
Table of Content Vol 3, No 1
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.145 KB)

Abstract

An LCA of French beans from Kenya for decision-makers Claudine Basset-Mens; Andrew Edewa; Céline Gentil
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.45

Abstract

Although challenging, private and public decision-makers increasingly demand for quantitative assessments of the environmental performance of value chains in South contexts. This paper presents and critically analyzes a complete LCA study performed with Endpoint indicators for a public decision-maker for the fresh French bean (FB) value chain of Kenya. A cradle-to-market-gate LCA study was done including five main stages: agricultural production, transport by road before pack-house, pack-house, transport by road after pack-house, intercontinental transport by air-freight and using 1 kg of raw French bean processed as functional unit. Supported by local experts, primary data were collected for all inputs and outputs for 33 farms over 5 counties and 2 pack-houses. An expert-based typology defined four farm types: large-farm, medium-farm, small-holder farm (SHF) contracted and small-holder farm scattered. Best available methods for field emissions were used and adapted when possible to local conditions (e.g. P losses). At market-gate, air-freight was identified as main hot-spot pleading for the design of stabilized FB products that could be sea-freighted. At farm-gate, large differences were observed between farm types and fertilizer, water and land use were the key-drivers of their eco-efficiency. Impacts due to pesticides applications were small at Endpoint level but were incomplete. These results should be validated with a greater sample of stakeholders and the scope of the LCA should be extended to the consumption stage. Research is also needed to provide LCA practitionners with operational and reliable tools for a better inclusion of pesticides’ impacts and uncertainty.
Using the LANCA® Model to Account for Soil Quality Within LCA: First Application and Approach Comparison in Two Contrasted Tropical Case Studies Alexis Thoumazeau; Céline Bustany; Jérémy Rodrigues; Cécile Bessou
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (286.408 KB) | DOI: 10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.42

Abstract

Assessing the effect of land management on soil quality is nowadays a key environmental concern, as the soil system is linked to major ecosystem services. There is a strong methodological shortage to integrate the impact of anthropogenic pressure on the soil system within large scale environmental frameworks, such as the Life Cycle Assessment. The LANCA® method was proposed to meet this need, integrating five impact categories of soil functions and directly applicable within the Life Cycle Assessment framework. Although the most recent 2016-LANCA® version shows readiness to be integrated in this large scale environmental framework to meet the demand, it has not yet been applied and validated on case studies. This study proposes a first application of the LANCA® model on two contrasted agricultural-based case studies to share experience in implementing the model through both background and foreground approaches, to analyze the first model outputs and to provide tracks for further model improvements. The results proved that both LANCA® approaches were poorly sensitive to the agricultural land managements tested. The foreground approach was difficult to implement due to the lack of transparency of the targeted characterization factors calculation procedure. Further global sensitivity and redundancy analysis should also be proposed in order to validate the consistency of the global model.
Critical parameters for integrating co-composting of POME and EFB into life cycle assessment models of palm oil production. Victor Baron; Mohamed Saoud; Joni Jupesta; Ikhsan Rezky Praptantyo; Hartono Tirto Admojo; Cécile Bessou; Jean-Pierre Caliman
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.72

Abstract

Palm oil mill’s co-products (empty fruit bunch – EFB and palm oil mill effluent – POME) management is a matter of concern in Indonesia. Co-composting is a promising waste management practice that would allow a reduction of environmental impact and a restitution of organic matter to the soil. This study is a part of a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) project and aims to pinpoint the most environmentally impacting compartments of the palm oil production chain. It deals more specifically with the Life Cycle Inventory of data on the composting process based on site specific data. Data on the recycled biomass, energy demand and yielded compost properties were recorded in an industrial palm oil mill over one year. Due to the local conditions, high nutrient leaching from the compost were recorded and the compost remained very wet and hot (thermophilic phase). The composting process only led to 40% of methane avoidance compared to anaerobic digestion of POME, and the global nutrient recovery efficiency was below 50%. We identified the following critical parameters to increase environmental benefits from composting:      i) the POME/FFB ratio from the mill ii) the roofing of the composting platform, iii) the POME/EFB ratio, iv) the turning frequency, v) the recycling of leachates and vi) the process duration and drying period. The nutrient recovery and the doses of compost applied in the field depend on all of those inter-connected parameters. The data presented will be used within LCA models to assess net environmental benefits from various POME and EFB co-composting systems.
A participatory, territory-rooted and change-oriented approach to assess the multi-criteria contribution of an agrifood value chain to sustainable development Jonathan Vayssières; Alexandre Thévenot; Ivonne Acosta; Mathieu Vigne; Emmanuel Tillard
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.84

Abstract

Agrifood Value chains (AVCs) can be powerful driving forces for sustainable development. Multi-criteria analysis is particularly useful for supporting decision making on improvement measures in AVCs. Methodological guidelines are still needed to effectively integrate environmental and socio-economical assessment tools and indicators at this level.In this paper, we propose a participatory, territory-rooted and change-oriented framework. The framework is applied to analyse the contribution of the main local poultry AVC in Reunion Island to the sustainable development of the territory. The main stakeholders of the AVC participated in (i) identifying key territory challenges, (ii) selecting corresponding appropriate assessment methods and indicators, (iii) defining the perimeter of the AVC and (iv) the improvement scenarios to be explored, v) providing data inventory, and vi) interpreting the results of the assessment.Both the environmental life cycle assessment and the effect method fit the proposed framework particularly well. They were applied to the same AVC data inventory, improvement scenarios were explored and indicators were spatialized to distinguish the local impacts in the root territory and externalized impacts at the global scale.In the ecological dimension of our case study, most of the effects linked to the AVC activities which threaten resources conservation and ecosystem health are externalized. This is due to strong dependency on foreign resources: in the case of fossil energy and raw materials used for livestock feed, 82% of environmental impacts occur outside Reunion Island. In the socio-economic dimension, the employment created by the AVC is mainly local due to the use of local services, 89% of jobs are provided in Reunion Island. Improvement of on-farm eco-efficiency was shown to be a mitigation option that would significantly affect the impacts of the AVC. Human and ecosystem health, and resources conservation would be improved by respectively +2.2, +9.8 and +4.8,% at global scale. But the AVC industrial network and the community would also be negatively affected, by respectively -2.2 and -3.0%, at local scale. This study underlines trade-offs between the environmental and the socio-economic dimensions and methodological challenges associated with the effective integration of assessment methods originating from diverse disciplines.
Life Cycle Assessment of electricity generation from Jatropha oil in a short chain in Mali Leticia MENEGHEL FONSECA; Nawelle CHAOUKI; Anthony BENOIST; Guillaume BUSSET; Roland PIROT; Mireille MONTRÉJAUD-VIGNOLES; Caroline SABLAYROLLES
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.92

Abstract

Jatropha curcas is an inedible oil crop which can grow under semiarid climatic conditions. Its oil can be used straight as fuel to provide energy in remote areas to improve living conditions. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impacts of the electricity generation from Jatropha oil under West African conditions, by means of a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). These potential impacts are calculated for four crop managements and compared to the ones of a reference electricity generation from conventional diesel. Data used in this work are from Jatropha plantations set up in Mali since 2006.LCA results show that the potential benefits of the Jatropha systems are highly dependent on the crop management, especially for the fertilization strategy and the promotion of the oilcake. However, in all cases, the Jatropha systems have lower impacts than the reference diesel system by 75% to 96% for abiotic depletion, and by 80% to 97% for ozone layer depletion, and higher impacts by 260% to 1000% for eutrophication, and by 26% to 160% for acidification. In the best case, the Jatropha system can also have lower impacts than the reference system by 76% for climate change, and by 88% for photochemical oxidation.A methodological originality of this work is the inclusion of animal and human labour into the LCA framework. A first model is proposed for the accounting of energy consumption and GreenHouse Gases (GHG) emissions due to labour. Concerning energy consumption, labour is not negligible with a share from 14% to 50% of the total impact of the Jatropha systems; however the highest share of 50% corresponds to the scenarios with the lowest energy demand. CH4 emissions from livestock are also not negligible but second-order in this study since they account for 2% to 13% of total GHG emissions.
Editorial – IJoLCAS Vol 3 No 1 (2019) Cécile Bessou
Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Life Cycle Assessment Network (ILCAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

none

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7