cover
Contact Name
Dr. Derita Prapti Rahayu, S.H., M.H.
Contact Email
deritapraptir@ubb.ac.id
Phone
+628538209916
Journal Mail Official
progresif.jurnalhukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Bangka Belitung, Desa Balunijuk, Kecamatan Merawang, Bangka
Location
Kab. bangka,
Kepulauan bangka belitung
INDONESIA
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
ISSN : 19784619     EISSN : 26552094     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif
Core Subject : Social,
PROGRESIF merupakan jurnal hukum yang dikelola oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung. Jurnal ini berisikan artikel hasil penelitian dan pengakajian di bidang ilmu hukum. Jurnal ini terbit sebanyak dua kali dalam satu tahun, yakni pada bulan Juni dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum" : 12 Documents clear
MEMAHAMI SECARA KRITIS PEMIDANAAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERBANKAN Faisal Faisal
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (711.157 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.953

Abstract

General Purpose of punishment in criminal law at least can be divided into two : first ,this goal patterned conceptual gave basis of criminal sanctions, the type and form of criminal sanction. Second, the purpose of criminal sanctions against those who violate the criminal law. In the banking law, not explicitly mentioned purpose of criminal sanctions in specific meaning. But can be seen in the banking law has only a more general purpose .
PENGATURAN HUKUM PERBATASAN NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG WILAYAH NEGARA Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (850.581 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.954

Abstract

The arrangements area of the country is done to provide legal certainty and clarity to citizens on the territory of the country. Area of the country as outlined in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 has an arrangement the Government of Indonesia that protects the Nations Indonesia, the utilization of earth, water, and air as well as the natural resources contained therein for the most of people's prosperity, decentralization of Government to the areas large and small that are autonomous in the frame of the unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia; and social welfare for all the people of Indonesia.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK PEMEGANG SURAT TANDA BUKTI ATAS TANAH BERUPA SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK DITINJAU DARI HUKUM AGRARIA Naufal Muhammad; Rio Armanda Agustian; Reko Dwi Salfutra
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (825.311 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.955

Abstract

Verdict Sungailiat Court Number 03/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Sgt in the verdict has stated the defendant (Feng Jung) has committed acts againts the law by certifying a plot of land to a National Land Agency of Bangka Regency on the Right Certificate Number 2305 was issued by the National Land Agency if Bangka Regency in 2003, but was sued by the plaintiff (Tjong Ana) in 2012. The results of research, Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 have been fulfilled by defendant in conducting process of land registration of Certificate of Property Number 2305 so that this provision is absolutely to run and about absolute authority to run about absolute authority of judge, that a judge of a Public Court is not authorized to declare a Certificate of Property Number 2305 has no legal force, and certificate that is a powerful evidentiary tool has become an absolute if element of Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1977 has been fulfilled.
REFORMULASI KEWENANGAN MPR PASCA AMANDEMEN UUD NRI 1945 Dwi Haryadi
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (864.202 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.956

Abstract

People’s consultative assembly (MPR) from the beginning is formed as an institution with consensus principle, a principle of people’s consultative through consultative agency. The position and the authority of consultative agency started to change significantly after the amandements of 1945’s constitution. Even some opined that people’s consultative assembly is no longer required. There are several important issues that will be discuss as the main topic in this paper. First, development planning vs broad outlines of the nations direction (GBHN). Second, the authority of people’s consultative assembly to set the regulating provisions. Third, the authority of people’s consultative assembly to provide a constitutional interpretation. Fourth, this assembly reviewed it’s own provisions. Fifth, this assembly issued a decree inaugurating of president and vice president. These fifth reformulation issues are crucial among the dynamics of our state administration system and our current conditions, also in order to strengthen the functions of the people’s consultative assembly as a center for people's representation.
REDISTRIBUSI KEKUASAAN NEGARA DAN HUBUNGAN ANTAR LEMBAGA NEGARA DI INDONESIA Rahmat Robuwan
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1061.674 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.957

Abstract

The relationship between state agencies basically can not be separated from the system used by the state government itself. Indonesia as a country that adopts a presidential government certainly has a pattern of distribution of power, although theoretically the presidential government system power state agency separate (separation of power), but the relationship between institutions is not a relative. The mechanism of checks and balances of power destribusi state institutions. Before the amendment, the agency is the State Supreme People's Representative Council (DPR), the President, the Supreme Audit Agency CPC, the Supreme Advisory Council (DPA) and the Supreme Court with the vertical power distribution. Following the amendment to the state institutions teridir of the President, the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), House of Representatives (DPR), the Regional Representatives Council (DPD), the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), the Supreme Court (MA), and the Constitutional Court (MK) with distribution horizontal power - functional. The distribution of power still has a problem among others, the discontinuity in the distribution of state agencies ranging from the overlapping powers of the president in participating deliberating the bill with the House, the confusion related to the division between the authority of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in the perspective of the state administration, the inconsistency of the parliamentary system that it wants to apply and the lack of authority DPD in parliament.
HUKUM PERDATA INTERNASIONAL INDONESIA BIDANG HUKUM KELUARGA (FAMILY LAW) DALAM MENJAWAB KEBUTUHAN GLOBAL Derita Prapti Rahayu
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (875.245 KB) | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.958

Abstract

In the current era of globalization and internationalization where economic, social and cultural developments have caused international relations to be infinite which can lead to civil disputes which give rise to the meeting of legal systems of countries in the world that have their own characteristics related to International Private Law. Hopefully there will not be many problems that arise if disputes over different citizenship civilizations are resolved through Alternative dispute resolution. Although when the Al forum decision on alternative dispute resolution was not carried out voluntarily by the parties affected by the execution, the execution of such decisions became the competence of the district court. Especially if the arbitration forum ruling was dropped outside Indonesia, then when the decision is to obtain recognition and execution within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Indonesia, the decision must first obtain an exequature from the Chair of the Central Jakarta District. Court. But the situation will be different if the dispute is not resolved through Alternative dispute resolution but is left to the court authorities to resolve it, it will be different.
MEMAHAMI SECARA KRITIS PEMIDANAAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERBANKAN Faisal, Faisal
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.953

Abstract

General Purpose of punishment in criminal law at least can be divided into two : first ,this goal patterned conceptual gave basis of criminal sanctions, the type and form of criminal sanction. Second, the purpose of criminal sanctions against those who violate the criminal law. In the banking law, not explicitly mentioned purpose of criminal sanctions in specific meaning. But can be seen in the banking law has only a more general purpose .
PENGATURAN HUKUM PERBATASAN NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG WILAYAH NEGARA Manik, Jeanne Darc Noviayanti
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.954

Abstract

The arrangements area of the country is done to provide legal certainty and clarity to citizens on the territory of the country. Area of the country as outlined in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 has an arrangement the Government of Indonesia that protects the Nations Indonesia, the utilization of earth, water, and air as well as the natural resources contained therein for the most of people's prosperity, decentralization of Government to the areas large and small that are autonomous in the frame of the unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia; and social welfare for all the people of Indonesia.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK PEMEGANG SURAT TANDA BUKTI ATAS TANAH BERUPA SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK DITINJAU DARI HUKUM AGRARIA: (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sungailiat Nomor 03/Pdt.G/2012/Pn.Sgt) Muhammad, Naufal; Agustian, Rio Armanda; Salfutra, Reko Dwi
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.955

Abstract

Verdict Sungailiat Court Number 03/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Sgt in the verdict has stated the defendant (Feng Jung) has committed acts againts the law by certifying a plot of land to a National Land Agency of Bangka Regency on the Right Certificate Number 2305 was issued by the National Land Agency if Bangka Regency in 2003, but was sued by the plaintiff (Tjong Ana) in 2012. The results of research, Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 have been fulfilled by defendant in conducting process of land registration of Certificate of Property Number 2305 so that this provision is absolutely to run and about absolute authority to run about absolute authority of judge, that a judge of a Public Court is not authorized to declare a Certificate of Property Number 2305 has no legal force, and certificate that is a powerful evidentiary tool has become an absolute if element of Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1977 has been fulfilled.
REFORMULASI KEWENANGAN MPR PASCA AMANDEMEN UUD NRI 1945 Haryadi, Dwi
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2018): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v12i1.956

Abstract

People’s consultative assembly (MPR) from the beginning is formed as an institution with consensus principle, a principle of people’s consultative through consultative agency. The position and the authority of consultative agency started to change significantly after the amandements of 1945’s constitution. Even some opined that people’s consultative assembly is no longer required. There are several important issues that will be discuss as the main topic in this paper. First, development planning vs broad outlines of the nations direction (GBHN). Second, the authority of people’s consultative assembly to set the regulating provisions. Third, the authority of people’s consultative assembly to provide a constitutional interpretation. Fourth, this assembly reviewed it’s own provisions. Fifth, this assembly issued a decree inaugurating of president and vice president. These fifth reformulation issues are crucial among the dynamics of our state administration system and our current conditions, also in order to strengthen the functions of the people’s consultative assembly as a center for people's representation.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12