cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
siti hatikasari
Contact Email
sitihatikasari@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jsh_fh@unib.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum
Published by Universitas Bengkulu
ISSN : 1693766X     EISSN : 25794663     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum [e-ISSN 2579-4663 dan p-ISSN 1693-766X] adalah nama baru sebagai pengganti "Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu sejak Tahun 1995. Jurnal "Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum" merupakan jurnal atau media informasi dan komunikasi di bidang hukum berisi artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian terkait bidang ilmu hukum yang meliputi Hukum Perdata, Hukum Ekonomi/Bisnis, Hukum Pidana, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Konstitusi, Hukum Islam, Hukum Lingkungan, Hukum Adat, Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual, Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak, Hukum Internasional dan sebagainya yang berhubungan dengan masalah-masalah hukum.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 35 No 1 (2026)" : 6 Documents clear
EFEKTIVITAS KEBIJAKAN PROGRAM MAKANAN BERGIZI GRATIS (MBG): EVALUASI BERDASARKAN PRINSIP TATA KELOLA YANG BAIK Mustaghfirin, Mohammad Aviv
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.1.44-60

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Food (MBG) Program is the flagship program of the Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka government which will be launched in 2025 with a budget allocation of Rp 71 trillion. This program aims to address chronic nutrition problems, especially stunting, and improve the quality of Indonesia's human resources. This study analyzes the implementation of the MBG Program from the perspective of governance. The research method uses normative juridical research with public policy analysis and study of regulatory literature, policy documents, and related academic studies. The results of the study show that MBG has several challenges from the principles of good government, namely transparency, accountability, and community participation. In transparency, challenges stem from the complexity of the reporting system, the difference in the price of foodstuffs in each region and the indication of price mark-ups during procurement and price distribution. In accountability, challenges stem from  the lack of internal auditor capacity at the regional level and the lack of a deterrent effect for MBG accountability violators. In community participation, challenges stem from the lack of community participation and public consultation on MBG Program planning. The collaboration strategy between state institutions is the existence of a centralized system for information exchange, cross-sectoral task forces at the national and regional levels, and the development of a platform information system.
MENGUJI KONSISTENSI BADAN PEMERIKSAAN KEUANGAN (BPK) DALAM TRANSPARANSI INFORMASI PUBLIK : STUDI ATAS LAPORAN HASIL PEMERIKSAAN KEUANGAN (LHPK) Zafia Furqan, Steffi
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.1.61-73

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the BPK audit function on the Audit Result Report (LHP) from the perspective of Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure (UU KIP). The main problem studied is the extent to which the public can access the BPK audit results as part of the implementation of the principles of transparency and accountability in a democratic government system. The method used is normative juridical research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The legal materials analyzed include Law Number 15 of 2004, Law Number 15 of 2006, and the 2008 KIP Law, supported by legal literature and decisions of the Central Information Commission (KIP). The results of the study indicate that normatively, the BPK LHP is open public information as long as it does not contain state secrets or material related to legal processes. However, in practice, the implementation of information disclosure within the BPK environment remains limited due to overlapping norms between the principles of openness and the protection of state secrets. Several KIP decisions, such as Number 009/VII/KIP-PS/2014 and Number 076/VII/KIP-PS/2018 emphasize the need for clarity in BPK's internal regulations in conducting consequence tests on public information. This study concludes that public information disclosure at BPK is not yet fully optimal and requires strengthening internal regulations and institutional commitment to balance the public's right to information with the protection of strategic state data. Thus, the implementation of information disclosure by BPK is expected to strengthen public trust and support the creation of transparent, accountable governance in accordance with the principles of good governance.
Evaluasi Demokrasi Kepemiluan Tahun 2024 Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara: Proses Pencalonan Wakil Presdien Aditya Andela Pratama; Muna, Kholifatul
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.1.74-100

Abstract

State administrative law has a strategic role in realizing constitutional goals through regulating administrative procedures and actions. The 2024 elections in Indonesia reflected the application of state administrative law, but were marked by administrative polemics, particularly in the nomination of Gibran Rakabuming Raka as a vice presidential candidate. The main problem arises from the inconsistency between Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and PKPU Number 19 of 2023, which causes legal conflicts in the administrative process of registering and determining candidates. This research aims to analyze administrative violations and evaluate the validity of the determination of Gibran's candidacy based on state administrative law. The results of the study are expected to provide legal recommendations to strengthen a transparent and accountable election administration system. The results of this study show that in material terms, the General Election Commission did not make careful preparations in the registration stage, and in formal terms, there was a delay in the issuance of the Minutes of Acceptance of Registration (BAPP). Both of these are contrary to the principles of State Administrative Law. The validity of the KPU's decision also raises juridical issues due to legal defects in the inclusion of the basis for consideration of changes to the KPU Regulation (PKPU). This finding indicates a weakness in the governance of registration administration that has the potential to invalidate KPU's decision through the State Administrative Court (PTUN). This research confirms the importance of the KPU to increase the accuracy in the preparation of each stage of the election in order to maintain the credibility and legitimacy of democracy in Indonesia.
REHABILITASI HUKUM BAGI KORBAN ERROR IN PERSONA DALAM SISTEM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN INDONESIA Sabrina, Nabella Difa
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.01.1-13

Abstract

This article examines the problem of error in persona within the Indonesian criminal justice system, namely the wrongful arrest or conviction of individuals who are in fact innocent. Although the Constitution and statutory regulations guarantee the protection of human rights, legal provisions governing rehabilitation for victims of error in persona remain very limited and are dispersed across various, non-integrated legal instruments. While several studies have addressed the issue of error in persona, this research offers a normative legal analysis focusing on the adequacy and coherence of legal regulations concerning the rehabilitation of victims of error in persona. The findings indicate that the existing rehabilitation mechanisms have not been able to provide optimal restoration of victims’ rights. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach by examining applicable laws and regulations. The results demonstrate the necessity of legal reform through the establishment of specific regulations that guarantee comprehensive recovery, including fair compensation, restoration of reputation, and psychosocial rehabilitation. Such reform is essential to strengthen the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights and to enhance the accountability of the criminal justice system in Indonesia.
PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS NORMATIF PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Faisal, Fatma; Muskur, La Ode Muhammad; Rahmatullah
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.1.14-25

Abstract

The principle of openness constitutes a fundamental foundation of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, requiring that the law-making process be conducted in a transparent and participatory manner. In Indonesia’s constitutional system, this principle derives its constitutional legitimacy from the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and is further regulated by Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations. However, legislative practice reveals a tendency to disregard the principle of openness, leading to formal judicial review before the Constitutional Court. This article aims to normatively analyze the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of the principle of openness in the law-making process. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court plays a strategic role in strengthening openness as part of constitutional democracy, although its implementation continues to face challenges in legislative practice. This article contributes to the development of formal judicial review studies by affirming openness as a substantive constitutional standard in law-making, while also enriching the discourse on formal review by elaborating openness as a substantive constitutional parameter and deepening the concept of meaningful public participation in the context of judicial control over the legislative process in Indonesia.
Analisis Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Mineral Dan Batubara: Studi Putusan Pemidanaan Pada Masyarakat Adat Maba Sangaji Di PN Soasio Amin Yasim; Faissal Malik; Nam Rumkel
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 35 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.35.1.26-43

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the judges' legal considerations in deciding a mineral and coal mining (Minerba) crime case involving the Maba Sangaji indigenous community at the Soasio District Court. The main problem in this study is how the judges' legal considerations in deciding the mineral and coal crime case in the verdict (A Study of Criminal Decisions for the Maba Sangaji Indigenous Community at the Soasio District Court). The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The data used consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the judge's considerations in the Mineral and Coal Mining crime case involving the Maba Sangaji indigenous community focused more on fulfilling the elements of the crime as stipulated in Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, as amended by Law Number 4 of 2009. In the judge's decision, with the indictment of Article 162 of the Mineral and Coal Mining Law, without optimally considering the existence and traditional rights of indigenous legal communities guaranteed by Article 18 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the decision has legal implications in the form of weak legal protection for indigenous communities in managing their territories, and has the potential to criminalize traditional community activities that have been carried out for generations. This research is expected to contribute to academics in the development of law enforcement officials and policy makers to pay more attention to the principles of substantive justice and recognition of the rights of indigenous communities in law enforcement.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 35 No 1 (2026) Vol 34 No 2 (2025) Vol 34 No 1 (2025) Vol 33 No 2 (2024) Vol 33 No 1 (2024) Vol 32 No 2 (2023) Vol 32 No 1 (2023) Vol 31 No 2 (2022) Vol 31 No 1 (2022) Vol 30 No 2 (2021) Vol 30, No 1 (2021) Vol 29, No 2 (2020) Vol 29 No 2 (2020) Vol 29, No 1 (2020) Vol 28, No 2 (2019) Vol 28, No 1 (2019) Vol 27, No 2 (2018) Vol 27, No 1 (2018) Vol 26, No 2 (2017) Vol 24 No 2 (2015) Vol 22, No 1 (2013) More Issue