cover
Contact Name
WAHID FATHONI
Contact Email
wafathoni@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
iclr@umy.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2nd Floor, Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusumo E-5, Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Comparative Law Review
ISSN : 26552353     EISSN : 26556545     DOI : 10.18196/iclr
Core Subject : Social,
Indonesian Comparative Law Review (ICLR) (ISSN: 2655-2353, E-ISSN:2655-6545 is a periodical scientific-journal published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta in collaboration with the Indonesian Association of Comparative Laws. The journal will be published twice a year in December and June. ICLR’s vision is to be a leading scientific journal in comparative law. ICLR has a unique approach in creating innovative discourse on harmonization among legal systems. ICLR will receive many articles from legal scholars from reputable universities worldwide.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 2 (2023)" : 5 Documents clear
The Implementation of Mutual Legal Assistance between Indonesia and Switzerland Regarding Asset Recovery Prawira, Muhammad Yudha; Alamsyah, Fatra
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17435

Abstract

Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (MLA) between Indonesia and Switzerland was ratified by the Indonesian government through the enactment of the Law Number 5 of 2020. It outlines the applicable legal framework for reciprocal legal assistance in criminal matters, including the trace of the proceeds of crimes. It is expected that this MLA may facilitate the process of returning assets from Switzerland to Indonesia. This article aims to discuss the implementation of the MLA between Indonesia and Switzerland in returning assets resulted from corruption which were especially stored in Swiss banks. This normative legal research employs both statutory and comparative approach. Analysis was made based on the study upon relevant legal materials, including national legislation, international regulations, and journal articles. It is found that the contribution of the MLA in regard to returning asset resulted from corruption is still minimum. The implementation of the MLA between Indonesia and Switzerland encountered obstacles and various resistance. More serious efforts are needed in order to achieve the main goal of the establishment of the MLA, namely asset recovery.
Legal Protection for Tik Tok Shop Buyers: Comparison between China and Indonesia Pratama, Naufal Bagus; Deniesa, Salsabilla
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17298

Abstract

The nature and scale of e-commerce are constantly changing. In today's world, the concept of internet purchasing became ubiquitous. All the purchases that consumers make is safeguarded by a set of policies in the form of rules imposed in each country; thus, the evolution of consumer protection is also inextricable from global influences. The term consumer protection refers to an umbrella term that encompasses many different aspects of economic transactions. The relevance of the law rests in the fact that the regulation works to protect individuals and the rights they are entitled to. In spite of the significance they have, customers frequently find themselves victimized by unethical commercial activities. This article describes the proliferation of E-commerce and the legal protection of the e-consumers who conduct buying and selling transactions, particularly in the TikTok Shop platform. This normative legal research relies on secondary data and employs both statutory and comparative approach. The finding shows that China has established a new law to safeguard and maximize a healthy shopping environment on an e-commerce platform. On the other side, Indonesia has not had a specific regulation for e-commerce yet, accordingly the legal protection for Tik Tok Shop buyers relies to the existing law, namely the Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection.The nature and scale of e-commerce are constantly changing. In today's world, the concept of internet purchasing became ubiquitous. All the purchases that consumers make is safeguarded by a set of policies in the form of rules imposed in each country; thus, the evolution of consumer protection is also inextricable from global influences. The term consumer protection refers to an umbrella term that encompasses many different aspects of economic transactions. The relevance of the law rests in the fact that the regulation works to protect individuals and the rights they are entitled to. In spite of the significance they have, customers frequently find themselves victimized by unethical commercial activities. This article describes the proliferation of E-commerce and the legal protection of the e-consumers who conduct buying and selling transactions, particularly in the TikTok Shop platform. This normative legal research relies on secondary data and employs both statutory and comparative approach. The finding shows that China has established a new law to safeguard and maximize a healthy shopping environment on an e-commerce platform. On the other side, Indonesia has not had a specific regulation for e-commerce yet, accordingly the legal protection for Tik Tok Shop buyers relies to the existing law, namely the Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection.
Harmonizing Regional Competition Laws and Policies: A Way Forward for ASEAN Economic Growth Fathari, Muhammad Reza; Efendy, Andi Rifky Maulana
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17910

Abstract

The prominent subject of discussion within the context of the ASEAN Economic Community is the harmonization of competition law in the region (AEC). In order to remove and reduce potential barriers to economic activity, ASEAN has adopted free trade through economic integration among its member nations. This study aims to examine why it is crucial to harmonize ASEAN competition law and to determine what the ASEAN business competition law harmonization model looks like. This paper used normative method with utilizing a statutory and a comparative approach which are presented descriptively. The results demonstrated that legal system conflicts can be addressed and legal disparities can be lessened by initiatives at harmonization. To do this, ASEAN must at the very least harmonize three key aspects of ASEAN Member States' competition laws: the substance of the law, law enforcement, and competition commission. In this context, collaboration amongst competition enforcement agencies can be used to implement the ASEAN model of harmonising competition legislation. Cooperation can take the form of notification, information sharing, enforcement cooperation between commissions, consultation, and conciliation.
Water Privatization Discourse in Indonesia: Legal Issues and Lessons Learnt from the UK’s Experience Hidayat, Al Fatah
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17985

Abstract

Legal protection of water resources is important as a rule and guidelines for human behavior as the purpose of the law to regulate public order. Legal developments regarding water resources need to be updated following the development of the community, so that the creation of legal protection for water resources can have an impact on water conservation. This study examines the policy of legal protection of water resources in Indonesia. It discusses the existing legal issues emerged in water privatization. Besides, it also explores the UK’s experience including the management and policy on the water exploitation. This study employed doctrinal legal research utilizing comparative, statutory, and conceptual approach. The discussion's findings demonstrate that the UK's approach to water management differs from Indonesia's. A system of water privatization is used in UK water regulation. The UK places a high focus on service quality and access to clean water. Therefore, the government offers complaint services regarding water quality in order to regulate the performance of the private sector. The Consumers Council for Water (CCWater) also provides assistance to consumers in homes and businesses. Water and sewage users in the UK and Wales are represented by CCWater, which also accepts unresolved complaints.
Notes of Protection: A Comparative Analysis of Music Copyright Laws and Enforcement Siregar, Runi Hilda Fadlani
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17927

Abstract

Music copyrights are not only considered as commodities but also considered as private property which must be recognized and protected by the state. In Indonesia, legal protection for copyright holders and creators is conducted through the National Collective Management Organization, while in Malaysia those issues are handled by Music Rights Malaysia Berhad. The purpose of this research using a comparative legal concept approach is to provide information about music copyright protection in Indonesia and Malaysia regarding legal issues regarding the position of the music copyright protection agency as well as prosecution and legal remedies for copyright infringements within the country and across countries. This study used normative juridical legal research. The results of study show that National Collective Management Institute (NCMI) and Music Rights Malaysia Berhad (MRM) have the same characteristics, namely as independent institutions and have attributive authority to take legal action against Music copyright violations. Furthermore, MRM has a narrower range of royalty collection than NCMI. In addition, MRM has no obligation to mediate if the case is a civil case. Besides, legal efforts that can be carried out by NCMI and MRM can be through the realm of criminal or casuistry litigation or arbitration.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5