cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahab Aznul Hidaya
Contact Email
wahabaznulhidaya@um-sorong.ac.id
Phone
+6281248582845
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljustisi@um-sorong.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Pendidikan No. 27 Kota Sorong
Location
Kota sorong,
Papua barat
INDONESIA
JUSTISI
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
ISSN : 19797532     EISSN : 26860821     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Justisi provides a forum for publishing research articles, reviewer articles from academics, analyst, practitioners who are interested in providing literature on Legal Studies in all aspects. Scientific articles covering among them : 1. Criminal Law; 2. Civil Law; 3. Constitutional Law; 4. State Administrative Law; 5. Internasional Law; 6. Legal Comparison.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 12 no. 3 (2026): justisi inpress" : 4 Documents clear
The Fulfillment of the Freedom of Contract in Indonesia’s Electronic Contract Regulation: An International Law Perspective Oliviani Yanto; Indirani Wauran
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.4566

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the alignment of Indonesia’s regulations on electronic contracts with the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce in order to promote reforms to contract law that are more adaptable to digital developments. The digital transformation has made electronic contracts the primary means of conducting cross-border civil transactions. However, Indonesia’s regulations under the ITE Law are considered to be limited to business transactions and do not yet accommodate other civil relationships. The method used is normative legal research employing legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study analyzes the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce as an international legal instrument serving as a guideline for harmonization. In addition, this study also examines the ITE Law and its implementing regulations as sectoral regulations, as well as the Indonesian Civil Code as the general legal framework that should ideally serve as the overarching regulatory framework for electronic contracts. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of the relationship between the principle of freedom of contract in the Indonesian Civil Code and UNCITRAL’s international standards, a topic rarely discussed in the national literature. The results of the study indicate that the UNCITRAL Model Law provides a flexible and universal framework consistent with the principle of freedom of contract; however, its application in Indonesia remains limited by the ITE Law’s focus solely on electronic transactions. The conclusion of this study is that harmonization of Indonesian contract law with international principles is necessary so that the regulation of electronic contracts can apply across sectors, not limited to business, and meet the dynamics of legal globalization.
Legal Strategy for Sustainable Sargassum Management to Improve the Maritime Economic of Bima Didik Irawansah; Kasmar Kasmar; Muhamad Amin; Absori Absori
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.5503

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe the economic potential of Sargassum in supporting the maritime economy of coastal communities in Bima Regency and to conceptualize strategic legal policies for the sustainable management of Sargassum to enhance the economic competitiveness of coastal villages in Bima. The method used is an empirical legal study employing a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. The study was conducted in the coastal village of Teluk Waworada, Bima Regency, using purposive sampling of relevant stakeholders. Data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. Analysis was conducted qualitatively through data reduction, presentation, and drawing of conclusions. The novelty of this study lies in the formulation of a legal governance policy model for Sargassum that has not been previously researched, integrating environmental protection, the empowerment of coastal communities, and the enhancement of maritime economic competitiveness in Bima Regency.  The results of the study indicate that Sargassum makes a tangible contribution to the income and economic resilience of coastal households; however, its utilization remains traditional, lacking downstream processing and legal certainty. The conclusion is that comprehensive local regulations are needed to ensure sustainability, added value, and the competitiveness of the Sargassum-based maritime economy.
Gender Dimension in Meaningful Public Participation: A Comparative Study of Village Regulation Formation in Indonesia and Poland Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Khasanah; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Ani Purwanti; Satriya Nugraha; Edvardas Juchnevicius
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.5493

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the gender dimension of meaningful public participation in the formulation of village regulations in Indonesia and Poland. Unlike previous studies, which generally addressed public participation, gender equality, or local governance separately and were limited to a single country, this study brings these three areas together in a cross-national comparison by assessing not only the presence of women but also their ability to influence decisions. The method of this study employs a qualitative approach with a normative-sociological comparative design. Secondary data in the form of legislation, scholarly articles, research reports, and policy documents were collected through a literature review and analyzed using document analysis, thematic analysis, and cross-national comparison. The novelty of this study lies in the development of a comparative framework linking four elements: legal guarantees, access to participation, women’s representation, and substantive influence on regulations. The results show that the legal frameworks of both countries have provided channels for local participation; however, provisions that tend to be gender-neutral have not yet guaranteed women’s substantive involvement. In Indonesia, village deliberations are more heavily influenced by social hierarchy, patriarchal norms, the dominance of the male elite, and women’s limited access to information and legal literacy, resulting in participation that is often merely procedural. In Poland, public consultations and local councils have more formal institutional structures and relatively more open access, but gender stereotypes and low representation of women in strategic positions still limit their influence on decision-making. Thus, the gap in Indonesia is primarily rooted in sociocultural barriers and participatory capacity, whereas the gap in Poland is more evident in political representation and institutional effectiveness. These differences underscore that legal recognition yields different qualities of participation when institutional contexts differ. This study concludes that meaningful participation requires gender-responsive consultation designs, the strengthening of women’s organizations, legal literacy, political education, affirmative action policies, and institutional support tailored to each country’s context.
Reorienting Medical Dispute Resolution: MDP, ADR, and Litigation Muhammad Darwis; Anatolijs Kriviņš; Abbas Ibrahim Al-Maliki
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.5579

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the structure of the medical dispute resolution mechanism as stipulated in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health and to examine its implications for the legal protection of patients, medical personnel, health workers, and health care facilities. The methods used in this study include a normative legal approach, incorporating both a statutory and conceptual framework, through a systematic review of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 3 of 2025, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 4 of 2025, Constitutional Court Decision No. 156/PUU-XXII/2024, and relevant scientific literature. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of the Multi-Layer Medical Dispute Resolution Model, which integrates the identification of medical incidents, complaints and clarifications, disciplinary enforcement by the Professional Disciplinary Council, alternative dispute resolution, and the potential for administrative, civil, and criminal liability into a single normative framework. The results of the research indicate that prioritizing out-of-court dispute resolution mechanisms forms a multi-layered model oriented toward dialogue, professional evaluation, and redress; however, its effectiveness is largely determined by the clarity of procedures, the capacity of dispute resolution institutions, and the guarantee of balanced access for the parties so that legal protection and access to justice are realized proportionally. The conclusion emphasizes that the normative design of the Health Law has the potential to strengthen legal protection in the field of medical disputes, provided it is accompanied by the strengthening of subsidiary regulations, institutional frameworks, and implementation practices that ensure non-litigation mechanisms truly serve as corrective and restorative measures, rather than mere procedural formalities that hinder the fulfillment of the parties’ legal rights.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JUSTISI Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari 2022 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Januari 2018 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Januari 2018 More Issue