cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahab Aznul Hidaya
Contact Email
wahabaznulhidaya@um-sorong.ac.id
Phone
+6281248582845
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljustisi@um-sorong.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Pendidikan No. 27 Kota Sorong
Location
Kota sorong,
Papua barat
INDONESIA
JUSTISI
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
ISSN : 19797532     EISSN : 26860821     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Justisi provides a forum for publishing research articles, reviewer articles from academics, analyst, practitioners who are interested in providing literature on Legal Studies in all aspects. Scientific articles covering among them : 1. Criminal Law; 2. Civil Law; 3. Constitutional Law; 4. State Administrative Law; 5. Internasional Law; 6. Legal Comparison.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI" : 5 Documents clear
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DIREKSI ATAS KERUGIAN PERSEROAN DALAM PERUSAHAAN GRUP ramsay, sahur
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v8i3.1823

Abstract

This study aims to determine the responsibility of the board of directors for the loss of the company in the group company. In a group company, there are holding company and subsidiary companies, empirically the subsidiary is an independent legal entity, but in the economic sector it is a representation of the holding company or business support for the holding company. The non-independence of the subsidiary has implications for the responsibility of the board of directors, in the event of a loss to a third party. The research was conducted using a normative juridical/library research method, secondary data obtained, mixed, analyzed qualitatively and described descriptively. From the research, it can be concluded that if the directors of the holding company are proven legally and convincingly in running the company in bad faith or mean bad deals cause the subsidiary to suffer losses, then the directors of the holding company can be held accountable for their personal assets based on the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and if the board of directors has more than one responsibility jointly and severally Keywords Limited Liability Companies, Directors, Group Companies
Pidana Penipuan, Jual Beli 2; PENIPUAN DALAM JUAL BELI KAVLING TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN PENGEMBANG PERUMAHAN KEPADA KONSUMEN: PENIPUAN DALAM JUAL BELI KAVLING TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN PENGEMBANG PERUMAHAN KEPADA KONSUMEN rahmad, noorramad; Setiyawan, Deni
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v8i3.1832

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to find out the basics and legal elements for housing developers who commit fraud in the sale and purchase of plots of land and how to be responsible for housing developers who commit fraud in the sale and purchase of land lots. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a status approach and a case approach. The materials used in this study came from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and non-legal materials. The research findings are related to the legal basis and elements regarding the fraudulent act of buying and selling land plots by housing developers to consumers, contained in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection Article 62 and the fulfillment of elements of fraud committed by owner of PT. ABC (property developer), so that his actions can be accounted for by article 378 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection article 62. Recommendations : first, the legal basis for developers who commit fraud in the sale and purchase of residential plots of land. Second, the elements of criminal acts of fraud committed by housing developers. Third, the responsibility of housing developers who commit fraud in the sale and purchase of plots of land. In line with the conclusions above, it is hoped that it will be used as learning material and add insight into the criminal fraud of buying and selling land plots by housing developers to consumers.
PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Naim, Sokhib; Hasriyanti Hasriyanti; Hadi Tuasikal; Simanjuntak, Kristi Warista
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v8i3.1899

Abstract

Prosedur PHK sudah dirumuskan sedemikian rupa dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan di dalam pasal 161 dan penjelasan pasal tersebut yaitu apabila terjadi pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh karyawan dapat diberikan tindakan mulai dari tegura lisan, teguran tertulis dan surat peringatan, dalam pemberian surat peringatan tidak harus diberikan secara berjenjang, melainkan dapat dilakukan sesuai dengan tingkat pelanggaran yang dilakukan, sementara akibat hukum dari PHK karena adanya pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh karyawan, maka perusahaan diwajibkan memberikan pesangon 1 (satu) kali ketentuan Pasal 158 ayat 2, 3 dan 4 undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan.  
PENGATURAN PHK EFISIENSI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Masrifatun Mahmudah; Markus, Dwi Pratiwi
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v8i3.1917

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the arrangement of layoffs for reasons of efficiency in the Manpower Act and the Job Creation Act, and to analyze the legal position of efficiency layoffs in the Job Creation Law against the Constitutional Court Decision No. 19/PUU-IX/2011. This normative research was conducted by means of a literature study using primary and secondary legal materials. The result of this study is that Article 154A paragraph (1) letter b of the Job Creation Law regulates layoffs on the grounds of efficiency that they may be carried out even without being followed by the permanent closure of the company. However, Article 154A paragraph (1) letter b has violated the Constitutional Court Decision No. 19/PUU-IX/2011 which states that efficiency layoffs must be followed by permanent closure of the company. Therefore, Article 154A paragraph (1) letter b contradicts the Constitutional Court Decision which has a higher position than the law because the source of the validity of the Constitutional Court's decision is the 1945 Constitution.
Konstitusionalitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kebebasan Beragama dan Beribadah di Indonesia Razak, Askari; A. Sakti R.S. Rakia; A. Darmawansya
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v8i3.1925

Abstract

In the explanation of Law no. 1/PNPS/1965 stated that the recognized religions in Indonesia are Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Hindu Buddhism, and Confucianism. As a result, other beliefs loses its legal standing and legal protection by the state. The issue of religious freedom is also influenced by the different interpretations of the terms "religion" and "belief" by the public and law enforcer. First, the terms "religion" and "belief" have different meanings. "Religion" refers to the religions adopted by Indonesian citizens, in accordance with the explanation in Law no. 1/PNPS/1965. While the term "belief" has no legal basis. Second, the terms "religion" and "belief" have identical meanings. If this opinion is recognized, then there will be generalization between "agama wahyu", and "agama budaya”. On the other hand, Article 29 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not yet have an adequate constitutional interpretation in resolving this issue.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JUSTISI Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari 2022 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Januari 2018 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Januari 2018 More Issue