cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mariske Myeke Tampi
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6281291909099
Journal Mail Official
era.hukum@fh.untar.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung M Lt.2 Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Tarumanagara
ISSN : 08548242     EISSN : 25810359     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/era%20hukum
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
"Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" (ISSN 0854 8242 | e-ISSN 2581 0359) merupakan media diseminasi (penyebarluasan) hasil penelitian, analisis putusan maupun kajian ilmiah konseptual dari akademisi maupun praktisi bidang hukum di seluruh Indonesia. "Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" terbit 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Oktober. "Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" mencakup tulisan keilmuan dari segala bidang hukum, termasuk tetapi tidak terbatas pada hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum internasional, hukum tata negara, dan hukum acara. Aspirasi wawasan regional, nasional maupun internasional terwadahi dalam karya orisinal yang mendasar (fundamental) namun memiliki unsur kebaruan (updated) sehingga karya yang dihasilkan merupakan hasil penalaran sistematis, relevan dan memiliki kontribusi tinggi terhadap pembangunan ilmiah bidang hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 18, No 2 (2020)" : 11 Documents clear
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN ATAS PPOB (PAYMENT POINT ONLINE BANK) YANG DIKELUARKAN OLEH PT PLN Moratua Silaban
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 18, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v18i2.9828

Abstract

Electricity is one of the vital life needs of the community. PLN, as the official provider of electricity, has issued a payment policy through the PPOB system with the aim of providing more service for consumers along with rapid changes in technology and information flow. But on the other hand, the policy of implementing payments through the PPOB turned out to have hurt consumer rights. Consumers are charged an additional administration fee which amounts vary, ranging from Rp1,600.00 to Rp5,000.00. This policy is unilaterally included in the standard agreement through the Power Purchase Agreement and violates the provisions in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK). So that the problem arises as to how the business actor's responsibility for consumer losses due to the PPOB system is based on Article 19 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) UUPK? and how do consumers protect against the implementation of clauses in electricity payment transactions? The research method used is normative juridical research method. The results of research that PLN violated the provisions of Article 4 letter b and c Article 5 letter c and Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter a UUPK, then PLN is responsible for losses suffered by electricity consumers who use electricity payment services through the PPOB system which is materially regulated in Article 19 The UUPK confirms that business actors are responsible for providing compensation for the damage, pollution and / or loss of consumers due to consuming goods and / or services produced or traded. However, the legal action of the consumer lawsuit that sued PLN in the South Jakarta District Court in its decision was rejected, so the consumer must accept the judge's decision and must accept the payment system that has been determined by PLN through the PPOB system. PLN's policy of applying the standard clause in the PPOB system benefits banks, but is detrimental to consumers because the basis of the charges is unclear and is detrimental to consumers. Thus, consumer protection against the implementation of clauses in electricity payment transactions applicable Article 18 paragraph (3) UUPK will be declared null and void.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Era Hukum Volume 19 No.2 Tahun 2021 Vol 19, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Era Hukum Volume 19 No.1 Tahun 2021 Vol 18, No 2 (2020) Vol 18, No 1 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2019) Vol 17, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2018) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) Vol 11, No 2 (2008) Vol 11, No 1 (2008) Vol 10, No 2 (2007) Vol 10, No 1 (2007) Vol 9, No 1 (2006) Vol 8, No 1 (2005) Vol 7, No 1 (2001) Vol 6, No 4 (1999) Vol 6, No 3 (1999) Vol 6, No 2 (1999) Vol 5, No 4 (1998) Vol 5, No 3 (1998) Vol 5, No 2 (1998) Vol 5, No 1 (1998) Vol 4, No 4 (1997) Vol 4, No 3 (1997) Vol 4, No 2 (1997) Vol 4, No 1 (1997) Vol 3, No 4 (1996) Vol 3, No 3 (1996) Vol 3, No 2 (1996) Vol 3, No 1 (1996) Vol 2, No 4 (1995) Vol 2, No 3 (1995) Vol 2, No 2 (1995) Vol 2, No 1 (1995) Vol 1, No 2 (1994) Vol 16, No 1 (2018) Vol 1, No 1 (1994) Vol 15, No 2 (2017) Vol 15, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2016) Vol 7, No 2 (2001) More Issue