cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Prof. Dr. Teguh Budiharso
Contact Email
proteguh@gmail.com
Phone
+6281226666561
Journal Mail Official
proteguh@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Greenville Residence A11-12, Mayang Village, Gatak District, Sukoharjo Regency 57557 Central Java Province, Indonesia
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
IJOLTL (Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics)
Published by Center of Language and Cultural Studies
ISSN : 25022326     EISSN : 25028278     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30957/
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other
IJOLTL invites original manuscripts in the fields of language, language teaching, linguistics, and applied linguistics. Although articles are written in English, the IJOLTL welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. Research on culture of various perspectives as well as linguistics is also welcome. In addition, IJOLTL also considers papers in the areas of applied linguistics, language testing, pragmatic, sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. Reviews of literature are also acceptable for the IJOLTL. The length of paper should be between 3,500 to 8,000 words as defined in the author’s guidelines.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020" : 5 Documents clear
Implementation of Postmethod Pedagogy as an Alternative to Communicative Language Teaching at the Tertiary Level Education Naushin Nazifa Islam
IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v5i3.633

Abstract

Along with the subsequent development in the field of English Language Teaching, the idea of methods has been criticized for not being sensitive to the contextual factors and also for being imperialistic in nature. The linguistic and cultural dimensions of archetypal methods establish the culture and language of the native speakers as the only erudite variety by promoting monoculturalism and monolingualism. Furthermore, even in Bangladesh, it can be seen that CLT has been applied as a method to teach English as a foreign/second language since the mid-nineties, but it has not brought any significant changes. Therefore, to overcome the obstacles and limitations experienced by the application of the prototypical methods, the notion of postmethod pedagogy has been introduced which focuses on the significance of contextualized materials to bring authenticity in English language classrooms, which in turn ensures learners’ motivation and successful intake of the lesson. At the same time, it also emphasizes the importance of teacher and learner autonomy. Hence, this research paper explores the scopes of the implementation of postmethod pedagogy and its effectiveness at the tertiary level English language classrooms in Bangladesh.
My Liberating Approach to Teaching and the Howabouts of Its Transforming Power Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini
IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v5i3.634

Abstract

This paper attempts to throw into sharp relief my liberal instructional approach, Competitive Team-Based Learning, and shed light on its design, objective, syllabus, materials, and tasks. It also gives a glimpse of the significance of my pedagogical approach for today's world context of globalization, which is characterized by despotism, capitalism, and imperialism. Most importantly, the paper explicates the howabouts of my liberating approach transforming power and highlights its distinguishing features and characteristics with reference to the present methods and approaches like CLT and particularly CL methods.
An Analysis of Lexical Cohesion in Donald Trump's Speech to the UN General Assembly 2017 Isma Farikha Latifatun Nuzulia; Istiqomah Wulandari
IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v5i3.635

Abstract

The aim of this research is to define a linguistic framework based on Donald Trump's manuscript at the 2017 General Assembly since Trump is an influential person in the world and it was essential to note how the impact of his speech could have a strong effect on audiences. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze and describe the types of lexical cohesion of HallidayHasan (1976) and Renkema's Theory (2004). In regard, the researchers analyze the most frequently known types of lexical cohesion following the analysis of the data and drawing conclusions based on the results. The findings showed that 80 data were found and 36 data included repetitions, 10 synonyms, 2 general terms, 3 superordinates, 10 collocations, 5 hyponymies, 6 antonyms, 27 anaphoras, and no cataphora and metonymy found in this analysis. After analyzing the results, the most dominant type found was repetition, which meant emphasizing their speech to show how powerful the American and show profound admiration for others.
Picture Word Inductive Model to Improve the Ability of the Procedure Writing of MTs Students Nuning
IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v5i3.636

Abstract

This study aims to improve the students’ outcomes in learning to write English procedural texts through the Picture Word Inductive Model (PWIM). The research subjects were 27 students of MTs Negeri 1 Jepara. This research was conducted in 3 cycles in which the students worked in groups of four. In first cycle, the students describe a picture of a certain food or drink menu using the PWIM, while in second cycle the students explain the procedure of making food/drink recipes as in cycle 1. In the third cycle, the students ask for or provide information on food/beverage recipes using the PWIM. Data collection was carried out simultaneously with observation during the action, while the data analysis was carried out simultaneously at the time of reflection on the action. From the results of analysis/reflection, it reveals whether the action will be terminated (if it has reached the target) or continues to achieve the target. The data analysis was performed using the triangulation method. The results showed that there was an increase in student learning outcomes in participating in learning English writing with the PWIM. In the original situation, there were only 8 students (22.22%) out of 27 students who could describe certain objects/people/ places. In the first cycle of action, there were 10 students (37.04%) who could make the procedure text more correctly. In the second cycle, 17 students (62.96%) could write procedural texts correctly. In the third cycle, there was an increase in student learning outcomes. There were 27 students (100%) who could write the procedural text correctly.
Team Game Tournament Learning Model to Improve the Students’ Speaking Achievement Noor Mardliyah
IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Center of Language and Cultural Studies [CLCS]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v5i3.637

Abstract

This study aims to find out whether the implementation of TGT can improve students’ speaking ability and activity in grade IX-D of MTs Negeri 2 Kudus. This is a classroom action research. This research was carried out in several cycles. Each cycle consists of planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The variables of this study comprise of student achievement and teacher activity. The results showed the teacher's performance increased according to the criteria on the indicator, which was shown in cycle I was sufficient and cycle II to be good. Student activities during learning are very good, in the first cycle with a percentage of 66.67% and the second cycle with a percentage of 93.33%. The students’ speaking achievement is shown by the average of students’ evaluation result in the first cycle (6.85) and the second cycle is 8.63. In the first cycle the students who finished learning were 14 students or 46.67% and those who did not complete as many as 16 students or 53.33%, and classical learning completeness 46.67%. In cycle II there were 30 students who had finished learning and none of them had finished learning, and classical learning completeness was 100.00%. This means that the results of the second cycle evaluation are better (increased) than the first cycle and need not be continued in the next cycle. The learning model of Team Game Tournament (TGT) is relatively high, reaching 81.73%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): September Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): May Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): January Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): September Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Mei Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Januari Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022): September Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): May Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): January Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): January 2021 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): September Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): May Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): September 2020 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): May, 2020 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): January 2020 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2019): September 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): May 2019 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): January 2019 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2018): September 2018 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): May 2018 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): January 2018 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2017): September 2017 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): May 2017 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): January 2017 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016): September 2016 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): May, 2016 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): January, 2016 More Issue