cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, S.H., M.H
Contact Email
rahadiwasibintoro@gmail.com
Phone
+6281542902305
Journal Mail Official
authentica.unsoed@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University Yustisia I Building, Room Number 110 Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Authentica : Privat Law Journal
Published by Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
ISSN : 26554763     EISSN : 26554771     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
AUTHENTICA aims to provide a forum for lecturers and researchers to publish the original articles about Law Science, especially Privat Law Studies. The focus of AUTHENTICA is publishing the manuscript of a research study or conceptual ideas. We are interested in topics which relate Privat Law issues in Indonesia and around the world, among them: Agrarian Law Adat Law Consumer Law Bussines Law Banking Law Family and Marriage Law Inheritance Law Sharia Law Legal Agreement And other Privat law Studies
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 2 (2019)" : 7 Documents clear
Legal Certainty In The Choice Of Dispute Resolution Forums Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal Certainty In The Choice Of Dispute Resolution Forums
Application of Prudential Principles in Registration of Granting Mortgage Right (APHT) Hesti Kusumaningrum
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.2.67

Abstract

The precautionary principle serves as a guideline for PPAT in carrying out the APHT registration process. In-Law No.4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights, PPAT Position, and Civil Regulations No.1 Year 2006 implies the precautionary principle regarding the provision that the PPAT is personally responsible for the duties and authorities in the process of making the deed. PPAT must apply accuracy in registering APHT to the Land Office. Registration becomes an important moment for the birth of Underwriting Right, the fulfillment of the principle of publicity, the position of the preferred creditor as the holder of the Underwriting Right. The data used in this study are secondary data with primary data as secondary data supplementary data. The approach method used in this study is the normative juridical approach. The results of the study obtained concluded that 2 (two) terms of the application of the precautionary principle of the form and content of APHT made by PPAT in accordance with applicable regulations, however, APHT registration occurred later than the 7 (seven) working day deadline. Not applying the precautionary principle can lead to legal consequences for the PPAT, APHT. and preferred creditors, from the aspects of civil, criminal, and administrative law. Preventive and repressive legal protection for all parties concerned in the series of APHT registration processes. Suggestions for PPAT need to apply the precautionary principle to minimize late APHT registration, the Land Office needs to apply administrative sanctions. Keywords: prudential principles; APHT registration; legal consequences
Object Index Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Object Index
Effectiveness of Notary Ethical Sanctions Against Violations of the Ethical Code by Notaries in Banyumas District Rini Andriati Siswoyo
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.2.68

Abstract

AbstrakNotaris sebagai pejabat umum harus mematuhi seluruh kaedah moral yang telah hidup dan berkembang di masyarakat. Kode etik profesi notaris adalah seluruh kaidah moral yang ditentukan oleh Perkumpulan Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Kode etik notaris berlaku dan wajib ditaati oleh setiap dan semua anggota perkumpulan dan semua orang yang menjalankan tugas jabatan sebagai notaris. Pengawasan atas pelaksanaan kode etik itu dilakukan oleh Dewan Kehormatan Notaris. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis efektivitas sanksi etik notaris terhadap pelanggaran kode etik oleh notaris di Kabupaten Banyumas dan mengkaji Hal-hal yang menjadi penghambat penerapan sanksi kode etik notaris di Kabupaten Banyumas. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis-sosiologis, dianalisis secara deduktif.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Efektivitas sanksi kode etik notaris berupa sanksi teguran dan peringatan tidak dapat dikatan efektif di Kabupaten Banyumas, sanksi kode etik notaris akan lebih efektif apabila dewan kehormatan notaris daerah Kabupaten Banyumas lebih menerapkan cara menentukan sanksi terhadap pelanggaran kode etik notaris sebagaimana disebutkan pada pasal 6 ayat 2 tentang penentuan kualitas dan kuantitas sanksi kode etik notaris, apabila sekali pelanggaran dapat dikatakan kualitas pelanggaran berat maka dewan kehormatan seharusnya dapat menentukan sanksi yang tegas tanpa harus melalui tata urutan sanksi kode etik, dan hal-hal yang menjadi penghambat penerapan sanksi kode etik notaris di Kabupaten Banyumas, adalah faktor penegakan hukum yaitu tidak adanya agreement antara Majelis Pengawas dan Organisasi Profesi dengan alat perkumpulannya Dewan Kehormatan. Serta faktor sarana dan prasarana yaitu tidak adanya prasarana dan fasilitas Dewan Kehormatan di Kabupaten Bayumas, karena tanpa adanya sarana dan fasilitas tertentu, maka tidak mungkin penegakan hukum akan berlangsung dengan baik. Kata Kunci :    Notaris, Kode Etik Notaris, Sanksi, Dewan Kehormatan. AbstractNotaries as public officials must obey all moral methods that have lived and developed in society. The code of ethics of a notary profession is all moral rules determined by the Indonesian Association of Notaries. The notary code of ethics applies and must be obeyed by each and every member of the association and all those who carry out their office as notaries. Supervision of the implementation of the code of conduct is carried out by the Notary Honorary Board. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of notary ethical sanctions against violations of the code of ethics by notaries in Banyumas Regency and examine the things that are obstacles to the application of the notary code of ethics in Banyumas Regency. The method used in this research is the sociological-juridical method, analyzed deductively. The results showed that the effectiveness of a notary code of ethics in the form of a warning and warning could not be effectively addressed in Banyumas District, a notary code of ethics would be more effective if the notary honor board of the Banyumas Regency applied more methods of determining sanctions against violations of a notary code of ethics as mentioned in article 6 paragraph 2 concerning the determination of the quality and quantity of notary code of ethics, if once a violation can be said to be the quality of a serious offense, the honorary council should be able to determine strict sanctions without having to go through the order of the code of ethics sanctions, and things that become obstacles to the application of the code of ethics sanctions notary in Banyumas Regency, is a factor of law enforcement that is the absence of an agreement between the Supervisory Board and Professional Organizations with the tools of the Honorary Council. As well as facilities and infrastructure factors, namely the absence of infrastructure and facilities of the Honorary Council in Bayumas Regency, because without certain facilities and facilities, it is not possible to enforce the law properly. Keywords:  Notary Public, Notary Ethics Code, Sanctions, Honorary Board.
Prohibition of Price Discrimination Practice Under Law No. 5 Of 1999 On Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unhealthy Business Competition Hangga Prajatama
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.2.21

Abstract

In the business world, business competition or competence among business people in seizing the market is very reasonable. However, this becomes unnatural when the competition is carried out in an unfair manner, with the aim of preventing other business actors from competing (barrier to entry) or shutting down competitors' businesses. One form of anti unfair competition carried out by business actors in creating market power has been anticipated in Law Number 5 of 1999, namely the existence of price discrimination. The research method used is normative juridical, namely legal research that emphasizes the review of legal documents and library materials related to the subject matter. Based on the research that has been done, there is an Article that Regulates Regarding Price Discrimination in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, which is located in Article 6 which states that business actors are prohibited from making agreements that cause one buyer to pay a price that is different from the price that must be paid by other buyers for the same goods and / or services. and the Guidelines for the Business Competition Supervisory Commission on Implementation Provisions in Article 6 of Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.Keywords: Prohibition, Price Discrimination, Law No. 5 of 1999.
The Role of The National Land Agency in Monitoring The Issuing Land Deed by The Temporary Land Deed Officer in Indramayu Regency Sabrina Widya Astuti
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.2.81

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the role of the National Land Agency in terms of supervision of the making of a land deed by the Acting Land Actor in the District of Indramayu. based on research that has been carried out the role of supervision carried out by the National Land Agency in Indramayu Regency contained in the regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning No. 2 of 2018 concerning Supervision and Development of Land Deed Making Officials. Research shows that supervision of the Temporary Land Deed Making Officials in Indramayu Regency has not been carried out by the National Land Agency. Supervision based on Permen ATR Number 2 of 2018 namely preventive and repressive supervision. Preventive supervision is to supervise the implementation of the PPAT position while repressive supervision is carried out by enforcing the rule of law in accordance with statutory provisions in the PPAT field. Keywords: National Land Agency, supervision, PPAT
Legal Consequences of the Marriage Agreement Made by Notaries, Then Not Registered Meisha Poetri Perdana
Authentica Vol 2, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.2.66

Abstract

The marriage agreement is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage, a marriage agreement is a means of protecting the assets of a husband and wife, this agreement the parties can determine their respective inheritance. Is there a separation of assets in the marriage from the beginning or is there a shared asset, but the method of division is divided if a divorce occurs. The inheritance of each husband and wife and property obtained as a gift or inheritance, respectively, is under the control of each other as long as the parties do not specify otherwise. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach. The data used in this paper are secondary data and primary data as a complement to secondary data. The results of research and discussion, namely the marriage agreement that is not recorded or registered, is invalid according to the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of marital property if the marriage agreement is not registered is that the property becomes joint property and assets default. Legal protection for a disadvantaged third party is by means of preventive legal protection in which a third party has the right to assume that the marriage agreement does not exist, whereas the refractive legal protection that is the third party has the right to file a lawsuit in court. Suggestions that the notary provides guidance to register the marriage agreement deed to the Population and Civil Registry Office in order to obtain validity and publicity. And the marriage agreement must be registered so as not to harm a third party. Keywords: Registration of Marriage Agreement, Marriage Property, Legal Protection of Third Party

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7, No 1 (2024) Vol 6, No 2 (2023) Vol 6, No 1 (2023) Vol 5, No 2 (2022) Vol 5, No 1 (2022) Vol 4, No 2 (2021) Vol 4, No 1 (2021) Vol 3, No 2 (2020) Vol 3, No 1 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2019) Vol 2, No 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2018) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) More Issue