cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Winsherly Tan
Contact Email
winsherly@uib.ac.id
Phone
+6281277621673
Journal Mail Official
winsherly@uib.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Jl. Gajah Mada, Baloi - Sei Ladi, Batam, Indonesia, 29442
Location
Kota batam,
Kepulauan riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Judicial Review
Published by Universitas Internasional Batam
ISSN : 19076479     EISSN : 27745414     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JJR is a journal which aim to publish the manuscripts of high-quality research as well as conceptual analysis that studies in any fields of Law. Articles submitted to this journal discuss contemporary legal discourses in the light of theoretical, doctrinal, multidisciplinary, empirical, and comparative studies. The scope of the paper submissions includes constitutional and administrative law, corporate law, business law, criminal justice, adat law, Islamic law, law and society, international law, international economic law, human rights law, and intellectual property law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 19 No 1 (2017)" : 12 Documents clear
Tinjauan Yuridis Tindakan Preventif oleh PPATK (Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan) di Indonesia dan di Amerika Serikat Wishnu Kurniawan; Rosna Rosna
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 19 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since money play a vital role in every person’s living, they are willing to try anything to gain as much money as they can even by doing crimes and they will surely try to hide their crime footsteps in order to avoid from being found out, so they will do an act called money laundering. There is an unit that plays an important role in every country which is called INTRAC (Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) in Indonesia and is called FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) in United States of America. The purpose of this study is to describe clearly and carefully about the similarities and differences of INTRAC (Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) in Indonesia and FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) in United States of America reviewed from preventive action, to know about their obstacles, and the strengths and weaknesses of both institutions in doing the preventive action, then to decide which FIU (Financial Intelligence Unit) is better in fighting against money laundering. This research uses normative research and then comparative method. Secondary data is collected using the library research. As all datas are collected, those datas are then being processed and analyzed qualitatively which means to group data and compile systematically. Further conclusions drawn related to this study, then decribed descriptively. Based on the results of this study showed that by reviewing from the main tasks and functions and competency related to the preventive action, INTRAC in Indonesia and FinCEN in United States of America have most significant similarity in being FIU that they have the same main task in fighting against the money laundering. Besides that, they also have differences and have very own obstacles, strengths, and weaknesses. According to the comparation between INTRAC and FinCEN, we can then know that FinCEN which was built in 1990 turns out to the better than INTRAC which was then built in 2002 in preventing and combating money laundering because FinCEN’s role is better in fighting against money laundering.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap PP No.6 Tahun 2010 Tentang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja di Provinsi Kepri Elza Syarief; Lu Sudirman; Deddy Eka Saputra
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 19 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local Government and Government Regulation No. 6 of 2010 on the Civil Service Police Unit has mandated that Public Protection is obligatory under the authority of both the Provincial and Local Government District and the City. On Government Regulation No. 6 of 2010 on the Civil Service Police Unit that requirements to be appointed as Municipal Police are civil servants, but in the province of Riau Islands Civil Service Police Unit number is still much that is not civil servant status. On Government Regulation No. 6 of 2010 on the Civil Service Police Unit that Article 16 point a that the requirements to be appointed as Municipal Police are civil servants, which Civil Service Police Unit has the task of enforcing local laws, organizing public order and peace and the protection of society, but to carry out this task Municipal Police Units are often contradictory and conflicted with the community. Civil Service Police Unit has the task of helping the head area as Regional Regulatory enforcement to create a serene area conditions, and orderly. Legal remedy solving problems where the Civil Service Police Unit of the police human resources of the Civil Service has had Permendagri 38 of 2010 on the Civil Service Training police, merging function that refers Satlinmas Regulation No. 6 of 2010 on the civil service and police force Regional Government only raised police members of the Civil Service only for the status of Civil Servants.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 25 No. 2 (2023): December 2023 Vol 25 No 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 24 No. 2 (2022): December 2022 Vol 24 No 2 (2022): December 2022 Vol 24 No 1 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 24 No. 1 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021): December 2021 Vol 23 No 2 (2021): December 2021 Vol 23 No 1 (2021) Vol 22 No 2 (2020) Vol 22 No 1 (2020) Vol 21 No 2 (2019) Vol 21 No 1 (2019) Vol 20 No 2 (2018) Vol 20 No 1 (2018) Vol 19 No 2 (2017) Vol 19 No 1 (2017) Vol 18 No 2 (2016) Vol 18 No 1 (2016) Vol 17 No 2 (2015) Vol 17 No 1 (2015) Vol 16 No 2 (2014) Vol 16 No 1 (2014) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2013): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 14 No. 1 (2012): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 13 No. 1 (2011): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 12 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 11 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review More Issue