cover
Contact Name
Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
Contact Email
trisnadewi.ecak@gmail.com
Phone
+6281805607760
Journal Mail Official
aktualjustice@unr.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Kampus Universitas Ngurah Rai, Penatih, Denpasar, Bali Denpasar
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Aktual Justice
Published by Universitas Ngurah Rai
Description Jurnal Aktual Justice adalah jurnal ilmiah ilmu hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang ilmu hukum Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian penelitian hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan, orisinal, kekhususan dan kemutakhiran artikel pada setiap terbitannya. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan melalui tahap review mitra bestari (double blind review by peer group system) sebagai syarat untuk dapat dimuat. Aktual Justice diterbitkan secara online dua kali setahun oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Ngurah Rai. Yaitu di bulan Juni dan Desember. Scope Aktual Justice terbit diterbitkan secara online dua kali setahun oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Ngurah Rai. Yaitu di bulan Juni dan Desember. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal ilmiah Ilmu Hukum dengan mengedepankan sifat orisinalitas, kekhususan dan kemutakhiran artikel pada setiap terbitannya. Tujuan dari publikasi Jurnal ini adalah untuk memberikan ruang mempublikasikan hasil penelitian orisinal, gagasan konseptual, pemikiran kritis, dari para akademisi, peneliti, maupun praktisi yang belum pernah dipublikasikan. Fokus dan lingkup penulisan (Focus & Scope) dalam Jurnal ini meliputi: Hukum Pidana; Hukum Perdata; Hukum Acara; Hukum Internasional; Hukum Adat; Hukum Pemerintahan; Hukum Bisnis; Hukum Kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice" : 6 Documents clear
Kedudukan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Modal Ventura Asing Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.536

Abstract

The juridical basis for supervision of foreign venture capital companies is contained in the provisions of Capital Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Presidential Regulation No. 9 of 2009 concerning Financing Institutions and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 18 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Venture Capital Companies. Foreign venture capital companies that invest directly in Indonesia are a form of foreign investment. This is inseparable from the wide scope of foreign capital, which is defined as capital owned by foreign countries, individual foreign citizens, foreign business entities, foreign legal entities, and / or Indonesian legal entities whose capital is partly or wholly owned by foreign parties. Supervision of foreign investment is carried out by the Investment Coordinating Board in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment. In accordance with the provisions in Permenkeu No. 18 / PMK / 0.10 / 2012 explained that the scope of supervision of venture capital carried out by the OJK is only limited to PMV Indonesia (Cooperatives or Limited Liability Companies). The implication is that OJK cannot supervise foreign PMVs that carry out direct financing. Because financing activities by foreign venture capital companies have intersecting rules, it is appropriate that foreign venture capital regulations only follow one specific rule. The regulation regarding financing institutions is only regulated in a Presidential Regulation. Although hierarchically, the status of the Perpres is an implementing regulation of the Law, the substance it regulates is not identical with the provisions of the Law which mandates it. Therefore, the provisions regarding financing activities should be regulated in a separate Law
TELAAH TEORITIS TERHADAP KONTRIBUSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI Benyamin Tungga
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.537

Abstract

The development of the national economy in its achievement is inseparable from the role of the legal sector. Interdeterministis, between economic and law, two things that affect each other. That is, it can also start from the demands of the economic field to the field of law that can serve as a useful contribution to support economic growth. Law as a normative provision has a very important role and function in the field of economy. Scientific writing is intended to describe the legal theory in economic development. The results of the study provide an explanation that the economic system in Indonesia is Pancasila Economic System that was born in the heart of the nation that is Pancasila and UUD-45 and its interpretation. Therefore, the economic system of Pancasila is directly sourced from Pancasila, especially the fifth principle, namely: Social Justice for all Indonesian people and the mandate of Article 27 paragraph (2), Article 33-34 UUD-45 (4th Amendment). The fifth precept explains that all national and state orientations, economic, legal, social and cultural politics, are imbued with a spirit of comprehensive justice and destined for all Indonesians. Thus the legal contribution in the development of the Indonesian economy is a Pancasila economic system supported by the 1945 Constitution and its interpretation.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERJANJIAN NOMINEE TENTANG PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH KEPADA WARGA NEGARA ASING (WNA) DITINJAU DARI PASAL 26 AYAT (2) UUPA Ni Putu Tanjung Eka Wijayani
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.538

Abstract

The nominee agreement is an agreement made between a person who by law can not be the subject of a particular land title (in this case the Right or the Right to Build). In this case a foreign national with an Indonesian citizen, which is intended for foreigners to possess the land of ownership or the right to use the building (de facto), but legally (de jure) of the land concerned on behalf of the Indonesian citizen. In other words, Indonesian citizen borrowed its name by foreigners citizen (acting as nominee). The existence of the obscurity of the norm in Article 26 paragraph (2) concerning whether the legal act of a foreigner / foreigner in a notarial deed called a nominee deed is valid for one year and thereafter if not transferred shall fall to the state having the same meaning and intent with the provision of Article 21 paragraph (3). This is particularly important to be considered since Article 26 paragraph (2) implicitly prohibits that legal acts directly or indirectly intended to transfer land rights from Indonesian citizens to foreigners / foreigners are null and void because the law and land fall to the State . Because the phrase that states other acts intended to directly or indirectly transfer the ownership rights to a stranger in Article 26 paragraph (2) of the BAL raises various interpretations (interpretations) so that there arises doubts that lead to the escape of norms (vague van normen).
Keadilan Pancasila dalam Persepektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles Riky Sembiring
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.539

Abstract

The basis of Pancasila justice is found in points 2 and 5, which reads the second principle of just and civilized humanity and the fourth principle of justice for all Indonesian people. Fair and civilized human values, that awareness of attitudes and behaviors that are in accordance with moral values ​​in living together on the basis of the demands of conscience by treating things as they should. Humans need to be treated according to their dignity and dignity, as God's creatures who are equal and have the same rights and human obligations. Based on this value, there is absolutely recognition of human rights. The value of social justice for all Indonesians implies both the basis and the goal, namely the achievement of a just and prosperous Indonesian society both physically and mentally. Based on this value, justice is a very basic value that is expected by all nations. The expected Indonesian state is an Indonesian state that is just. Justice is described fundamentally by Aristotle, namely to know about justice and injustice, three main things must be discussed, namely what actions are associated with the term, what justice means, and between the two extreme points whether justice lies.
PENYIDIKAN POLRI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI DIREKTORAT RESERSE KRIMINAL KHUSUS POLDA BALI T. Widodo Rahino
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.540

Abstract

This study used qualitative research methods to find the facts straight spaciousness to dig and explore the factors inhibiting what makes Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police are not optimal in carrying out duties in handling the problem of corruption in Indonesia. The findings of the study authors to submit a brief that the Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police is not optimal in the performance of its duties in the handling of corruption. Many of the obstacles faced by the Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police & Police like in terms of personnel, educational background, lack of technical instructions in the investigation regarding the handling of the Criminal Investigation Corruption, inadequate infrastructure, which is still very limited budget, going back and forth frequently the case, still merged the investigation at the Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police Criminal Investigation Police makes no maximum results in performance of duties by personnel of Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police. So the conclusion of this research is the Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police is not optimal in performing law enforcement duties of corruption and other organizational structure recommendation two researchers present the comparison with the Attorney (Assistant Attorney General for Specific Criminal Crime Case) and its Corruption Eradication Commission and other supporting data to prove that the, Directorate of Special Crime Investigation Bali Regional Police in the hope of renewal and improvement of the organizational.
TANAH ASET PT. PANCA WIRA USAHA MILIK PERUSAHAAN DAERAH PROPINSI JAWA TIMUR DIDUDUKI MASYARAKAT karyoto karyoto
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.541

Abstract

The origin of land asset PT Panca Wira Usaha owned by East Java Province company, obtained from former land of western rights, relics of Dutch company at the time of colonize in Indonesia. Dutch dominate the land through Verenigde Oost - Indische Compagnie (VOC). VOC is a Dutch-owned legal entity engaged in trade. Before VOC control land in Indonesia, the control of the land is still done by Kings in the territory of his power, as well as by the customary law community within its territory. When the VOC came to Indonesia around 1577 with the intention to trade and made the kingdom of Mataram a protectorate and since then the role of local officials gradually began to change. The arrival of VOC in Indonesia aims for the following matters: Prevent competition among Dutch traders Obtain a trade monopoly in south Asia or exclusively master the spices both in producing and trading VOC as a Dutch-owned legal entity engaged in trade, it is a little more know the public legal aspects as the influence of Roman law, although no relation belongs to the land, but VOC make agreements with the landowners as if to voc charge as an obligation to rent land through an agreement that is essentially so that the visible aspect of democracy appears. The Dutch Government established factories in big cities after the VOC successfully mastered inland village for agriculture, plantation and others. One of the factory is Oil Factory "N. V OLIEFABRIEKEN INLINDIE" or known as "Pabrik Minyak Nabati-Yasa PT Panca Wira Usaha", located in Kediri City Government of East Java Province, which is currently a problem between PT Panca Wira Usaha, East Java Provincial Government Owned Enterprises with the Community of the landowners. The main issue is the provisions of the Law regulating the Dutch Heritage Company, such as Law No. 86 Of 1958 about the nationalization of Dutch-owned enterprises in Indonesia, not supported by UUPA No. 5 Of 1960 on the basic rules of agrarian basic. While UUPA No. 5 Of 1960 has not been clear in explaining and describing the meaning and substance of the land of the former western rights of the Dutch company, resulting in land tenure by the community.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6