cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mahrus Ali
Contact Email
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Merdeka University Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Madya VII/2 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Published by Universitas Merdeka Surabaya
ISSN : 20866852     EISSN : 25985892     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Social,
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of the articles published in YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Medical Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law. YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March" : 6 Documents clear
Juridical Review of Decriminalization on Efforts to Cut Drugs Users’ Addiction In Indonesia Haniyah; M. Hidayat
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

As a developing country with a large population and strategic location , Indonesia has become market place for world's drug circulation. The number of victims is higher year by year. Drug victims are victims of abuse of narcotics that basically violate government regulations. So far, drug addicts in Indonesia are subject to criminal sanctions, yet from year to year the criminal sanctions applied to the victims of drug addicts have not decreased even on the contrary increasing sharply causing the emergence of drug emergency in Indonesia. The present research applies normative juridical review by providing descriptive analysis based on the data so as to provide arguments on realities that exist to provide an overview of solution. The government continues to reduce the number of victims of drug addicts, through the implementation of government decriminalization policy for victims of drug abuse and government policy on the implementation of the obligation to report for drug addicts to the receiving institutions for obtaining rehabilitation. Decriminalization policy has not been able to break the circulation of the drug chain in Indonesia as there are other factors that have not been able to be performed optimally in breaking the circulation of drugs in Indonesia.
Due to The Law of Property Ownership Certificate (Shm) Site of More Than 5 Plots Gesang Iswahyudi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose of this paper is to determine the existence and understand the limitations of property ownership of more than 5 (five ) parcel of land plots relating to the site. State regulating land ownership with the status Certificate of Land Ownership (SHM), where people can only have a maximum of five (5) areas, or the total area of the SHM ownership of no more than 5000 m2 (Five thousand square meters) and That restrictions on land ownership as mandated by Article 7, Article 17 in this case regarding non-agricultural property till now there is no restriction, or no regulation concerning the maximum limit of non-agricultural land property rights. The setting of this case as stated in the Decree of the State Minister of Agrarian Affairs / Head of National Land Agency Number 6 of 1998 on the Granting of Property Rights to Land for House Live. Basic implementation is the treatise consideration plots tread head of BPN RI regulation no. 1 In 2010, dated January 25, 2010. The results of this paper are In order to achieve what is set forth in article 33, paragraph 3 of the Constitution in 1945 the BPN in this case must issue rules concerning restrictions on non-agricultural land property rights more comprehensive and complete in order to prevent and take action if there are groups or parties that accumulate land property rights of non-agricultural, should establish regulations governing the restriction of property rights of non-agricultural formulated-rumusanyang together with the provisions of the restrictions on the land, for example, divide the category of land property rights of non agriculture based strategic area or is not strategic and so that individuals and entities the national land (BPN) to each of limitations of ownership by a person to land his property, so can the implementation of landreform and enacting Law No. 5 of 1960 on Basic Regulation of Agrarian (Basic Agrarian Law) ditelah expected, in relation to the utilization of city planning, site plans is one means of controlling and regulating the use of urban space, and as a driver of regional development optimally, due to site plan contains basic guidelines for area planning, construction planning, area managers, building owners, users or occupant as well as the others associated with the region in preparing and managing a regional part of an operational nature and binding. to resolve this matter roads that can be taken by the owner / individual if you want to file a certificate solution in accordance with his wishes (although more than 5 fields) is to submit a certificate as well as propose the process of solving the tread plots to the National Land Agency (BPN).
Notary Liability That Does not Pay Bea Acquisition of Land And Building For Application Process Rights to Building Akta Kusuma Wijaya Jati
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Notary authorized to make the deed of release and granting of land rights and whether Notary authorized to receive money deposits that are deposited from client BPHTB. The conclusions are as follows: Notaries have the authority to make the deed land rights, the release of land rights held, whereas subjects that require land does not qualify to be the holder of the rights to the land necessary so it can not be obtained with the purchase and land-rights holders are willing to relinquish their land rights. PT. Pawnshops do not qualify as holders of land titles it releases, so the release was not carried out in the presence of PPAT, but in the presence of a notary as public officials who have the authority a deed covenant (covenant waiver of land on ownership status). Notary authorized to receive money deposit BPHTB deposited from client, given notary as a public official in increasing source of state revenues from taxes, notary also plays a major role because they are assigned to investigate had paid income tax (VAT) of revenue as a result of transfer of rights over land and Customs Acquisition land and Building before a deed, this means that if client are not paying taxes to the Tax Administration, client can leave a notary public also plays a major role because they are assigned to investigate had paid taxes due to the transfer of rights over land and Customs Acquisition rights to land and Building.
The Criminal Liability of The Defamation Perpetrators Against The President or Vice President After Having The Court Decision Number Constitutional 013-022 / Puu-Iv / 2006 Dyas Tazza Ulima
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Base on the interest to Realize the goals of the state, Indonesia Gives the power to the president as the representative of the state to run the government rate and its existence is highly protected. One of the Efforts to protect the president and vice president is by setting the criminal sanctions Relating to crimes againts the dignity of the precident or vice president of the which stipulated in Article 134, 136 bis and 137 of the Criminal Code. However, there must be a deeper study with the application of Reviews These provisions. It is Because there are some shifts have happended towards the provisions after having the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022 / PUU-IV / 2006. Formulation of the problem in this research is about the rule and the criminal liability of the perpetrators defamation against the president or vice preseident after having the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022 / PUU-IV / 2006. The method used is the which is legal research with statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach, through a comparison of the Criminal Code in the Netherlands, Germany and Thailand. The result in this reasearch shows that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022 / PUU-IV / 2006, the rule defamation against the president or vice president of the personal qualities addresed to be subject to the rules of Chapter XVI Criminal Code. In the case of defamation addresed to the president or vice president as an official of the State, be subject to the rules of Article 207 Criminal Code. In addition to the Criminal Code, the rules can be applied Also regulated under the Broadcasting Act and the Information and Electronic Transactions Act. Moreover, the subject of the which can be burdened with the criminal liability is an individual (base on the rules in the Criminal Code and the Broadcasting Act); individual and corporation (base on the rules in Information and Electronic Transactions Act);
Abortion In The Aspects of Criminal Law And Health Agung Putri Harsha Satya Nugraha; Vivin Indrianita; Bastianto Nugroho
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abortion or commonly referred to abortion into the human civilization because humans do not want the pregnancy. Since centuries ago, many nations have known checkers wear some plant species believed to stimulate contraction of uterus to shed or dropped fetus. Abortion itself can occur either due to human actions (abortion provocatus) or because of natural causes, that happens by it self, in the sense that not because of human actions (abortion spontatus). Abortion is happening because of human actions can occur either because it is driven by medical reasons, such as pregnant women who suffer from a disease and to save the lives of these women then abortion must be terminated (abortion therapeuticus). Besides, for reasons that are not justified by the law (abortion criminalis). The method used in this research is normative juridical consideration that the starting point of the research analysis of the laws and regulations of the Criminal Code, Act No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Law No. 36 of 2009 on health associated with the renewal of the crime of abortion.
Bank Indonesia Policy in the National Banking Crisis Resolution Surti Yustianti; Mohammad Roesli
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the philosophy of banking policies which have implications for the criminal offense. In this regard, Bank Indonesia's decision is in conformity with the authority and office attached to Bank Indonesia officials. Policies made by Bank Indonesia is right or not, is bound by the principle of wise and good etiquette. Bank Indonesia officials have the authority associated with the position. If there are elements that are not good etiquette and undiplomatic in authority that caused state losses then policies can be categorized as a criminal offense banking. The aim of this study was to analyze and find Philosophy as Bank Indonesia Policy In the Bank Restructuring. Type of research is a normative legal research. This study uses the legislative approach, conceptually. Banking policy which resulted in a criminal act can be seen from the administrative aspect, and a criminal in a lawsuit conducted by Bank Indonesia officials. If Bank Indonesia officials make mistakes in order to carry out regulatory policies, the criminal incurred should be charged to the official.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): September Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 19 No. 4 (2024): March Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): September Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): March Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): 30 September 2022 Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): December Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): March Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021): December Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Juni Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): March Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): Desember Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): Juni Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): March Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): September Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): March Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): September Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): September More Issue