cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Patricia Rinwigati Waagstein
Contact Email
ilrev@ui.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ilrev@ui.ac.id
Editorial Address
DRC Office Building F 3rd Floor, Faculty of Law University of Indonesia, Depok - 16424
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Indonesia Law Review (ILREV)
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : 20888430     EISSN : 23562129     DOI : 10.15742/ilrev
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) is an open access, double-blind peer-reviewed law journal. It was first published by the Djokosoetono Research Center (DRC) in 2011 to address the lack of scholarly literatures on Indonesian law accessible in English for an international audience. ILREV focuses on recent developments of legal scholarship, covering legal reform and development, contemporary societal issues, as well as institutional change in Indonesia. Realizing the global challenges and ever-increasing legal interaction among developing countries, ILREV also welcomes articles on legal development in the ASEAN region and the larger Global South. By that token, it aims to provide a platform for academic dialogue and exchanges of ideas between scholars and professionals, especially from the Global South. As such, ILREV encourages comparative, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and other approaches to law which can enrich the development of legal scholarship not only in Indonesia but also the Global South as a whole.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 15, No. 3" : 6 Documents clear
Green Bonds as a Green Investment to Prevent Greenwashing and Green Financial Crime in Indonesia Serfiyani, Cita Yustisia
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Overcoming the climate crisis should not only be pursued from the aspect of technological invention but also from the financial aspect through issuing securities instruments that align with the green economy mission. Unfortunately, irresponsible parties such as corporations still use the green economy concept for personal gain through greenwashing and green financial crime. The presence of green bonds as green instruments shows a positive trend towards improving the quality of environmentally friendly technological innovations, building green infrastructure, and increasing income in line with increasing public participation in climate issues. However, its application in Indonesia is constrained by the complexity of issuance eligibility requirements which are detrimental to issuers and has not been accompanied by strict and transparent audit quality so that the public is disadvantaged when a default occurs so that legal protection for green bonds needs to be applied in several aspects. Therefore, the Indonesian public's interest in green bonds should be accompanied by an increase in the eligibility requirements and procedures for issuing green bonds.
GOVERNING CYBERTERRORISM IN INDONESIA: RESILIENCE AND GAPS IN THE DRAFT CYBERSECURITY LAW (RUU KKS 2025) Utomo, Eko Setyo
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia’s accelerating digital transformation and persistent terrorist threats expose both resilience gains and governance gaps in its cybersecurity framework. This article examines the Draft Law on Cybersecurity and Resilience (RUU KKS 2025), which consolidates the authority of the National Cyber and Encryption Agency (BSSN) and strengthens protections for critical information infrastructure. While the bill enhances technical resilience and institutional coordination, it remains silent on cyberterrorism, leaving statutory, institutional, and international gaps. Drawing on cybersecurity theory, securitization theory, and hybrid warfare theory, the study argues that resilience without terrorism-specific provisions is strategically insufficient. Comparative analysis with the United Kingdom’s Terrorism Act, the European Union’s NIS2 Directive, Singapore’s Cybersecurity Act, and Australia’s Security of Critical Infrastructure Act highlights Indonesia’s progress in resilience but also its lag in criminalizing and governing cyberterrorism. Empirical evidence from interviews with policymakers, security officials, and civil society confirms the persistence of normative ambiguity and institutional overlap. The article concludes that unless amended, the RUU KKS risks creating a governance system that is technically robust but strategically incomplete. To address this, three measures are recommended: (1) introducing a statutory definition of cyberterrorism; (2) institutionalizing inter-agency coordination; and (3) pursuing international alignment with regional and global best practices. Together, these reforms would enable Indonesia to move toward a multidimensional governance framework capable of addressing the evolving threat of cyberterrorism.
Cybercrime Regulations in the National Criminal Code Sitompul, Josua
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In early 2023, Indonesia promulgated the National Criminal Code, which will be effectively enforceable in 2026. The promulgation is considered a historical milestone in the development of Indonesia’s criminal law that has strategic consequences for the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This new code repeals criminal provisions from 29 different acts, including the Electronic Information and Transactions Act (EIT Act). Policymakers inserted and developed new concepts into the new code, one of which is the concept of cybercrime. Employing a doctrinal legal research method, this article analyses the approaches used in the new code to regulate cybercrime. The results showed that the approaches implemented in the National Criminal Code have widened the scope of cybercrime with discordances. In that regard, the article emphasises the importance of law enforcement agencies scrutinising the use of cybercrime provisions according to their purposes, and they have to address inconsistencies and disharmonious provisions found within the code to prevent overcriminalisation.
REGULATORY COOPERATION ON CROSS-BORDER PERSONAL DATA FLOWS BETWEEN CHINA AND MALAYSIA: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER RCEP AND CPTPP FRAMEWORKS Shan, Deng
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

China and Malaysia have demonstrated strong momentum in the development of their digital economy. However, the management and protection of personal data in cross-border flows have emerged as major challenges, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced regulatory cooperation to ensure data security and circulation efficiency. This study employs a qualitative research methodology, with a focus on comparative analysis and documentary research, to examine the similarities and differences in data governance rules under the frameworks of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). It further examines the role and challenges of these frameworks in facilitating cross-border regulatory cooperation on personal data between China and Malaysia, as well as assessing the impact of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on Malaysian legislation and China-Malaysia cross-border data regulatory cooperation within the RCEP and CPTPP frameworks. The study shows that China and Malaysia can leverage the RCEP as a mechanism for transitions and adjustments, and draw on the high-standard rules of the CPTPP to explore an innovative and inclusive cooperation model. The study proposes the idea of building a regional cross-border data governance framework, aiming to promote both cross-border management coordination of personal data between China and Malaysia, and further development of the digital economy in the two countries.
Cultivating Synergy: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Agrivoltaics Frameworks for Thailand's Sustainable and Just Energy Transition Keawchaum, Chirat
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article conducts a critical comparative analysis of the legal frameworks for agrivoltaics (AV), employing the theoretical lenses of "Energy Justice" and "Social Costs" to evaluate the structural challenges in Thailand. It contrasts the Thai context with successful models and cautionary tales from a range of international jurisdictions, including Germany, France, Japan, Italy, the United States, and China. The central thesis posits that Thailand's current approach constitutes a "structural limitation," characterized by siloed sectoral laws that misclassify AV under an inappropriate industrial paradigm, thereby creating the most significant constraint to its equitable scaling. Drawing on international best practices, notably Germany's technical standard DIN SPEC 91434 and France's agriculture-centric functional definition, this paper develops a detailed blueprint for legal reform in Thailand. The proposed framework focuses on establishing a distinct "legal identity" for agrivoltaics, safeguarding against the risks of "pseudo-agriculture" and "land financialization." Ultimately, this reform aims to unlock the technology's potential to address Thailand's interconnected trilemma of energy transition, food security, and land-use optimization in a manner that is both sustainable and just.
FLOATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ON THE HORIZON. DO WE NEED A REVISED BRUSSELS CONVENTION ON THE LIABILITY OF THE OPERATORS OF NUCLEAR SHIPS? Handrlica, Jakub
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adopted in 1962, the Brussels Convention on the Liability of the Operators of Nuclear Ships has been considered an obsolete instrument for the last 60 years. In light of renewed interest in floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs), this article revisits the regime of this half-forgotten Convention and calls for its modernisation. The fact is that a robust legal framework for liability and compensation must accompany any prospective deployment of FNPPs. This article argues that adopting a Revised Brussels Convention will help address these challenges. This article aims to identify the reasons for this modernisation and to outline its significant features. It also argues that adopting a Revised Brussels Convention could represent an important opportunity to establish a nuclear liability framework for FNPPs in countries such as Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, or Vietnam.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 16, No. 1 Vol. 15, No. 3 Vol. 15, No. 2 Vol. 15, No. 1 Vol. 14, No. 4 Vol. 14, No. 3 Vol. 14, No. 2 Vol. 14, No. 1 Vol. 13, No. 3 Vol. 13, No. 2 Vol. 13, No. 1 Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 11, No. 3 Vol. 11, No. 2 Vol. 11, No. 1 Vol. 10, No. 3 Vol. 10, No. 2 Vol. 10, No. 1 Vol. 9, No. 3 Vol. 9, No. 2 Vol. 9, No. 1 Vol. 8, No. 3 Vol. 8, No. 2 Vol. 8, No. 1 Vol. 7, No. 3 Vol. 7, No. 2 Vol. 7, No. 1 Vol. 6, No. 3 Vol. 6, No. 2 Vol. 6, No. 1 Vol. 5, No. 3 Vol. 5, No. 2 Vol. 5, No. 1 Vol. 4, No. 3 Vol. 4, No. 2 Vol. 4, No. 1 Vol. 3, No. 3 Vol. 3, No. 2 Vol. 3, No. 1 Vol. 2, No. 3 Vol. 2, No. 2 Vol. 2, No. 1 Vol. 1, No. 3 Vol. 1, No. 2 Vol. 1, No. 1 More Issue