cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M Misbahul Mujib
Contact Email
misbahul.mujib@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281392409940
Journal Mail Official
supremasi.uinsuka@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syari'ah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Kalijaga; Jalan Marsda Adi Sucipto, Caturtunggal, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 23021128     EISSN : 27234207     DOI : https://doi.org/10.14421/sh
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The focus and scope of SUPREMASI HUKUM: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum are legal Science, including the study of Law issues in Indonesia and around the world, either research study or conceptual ideas. Generally we are interested in all law studies such as following topics Civil Law, Criminal Law, Civil Procedural Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, State Administrative Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Environmental Law, Legal Theory and Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum" : 13 Documents clear
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penjatuhan Pidana Tambahan Pencabutan Hak Memilih dan Dipilih Dalam Jabatan Publik Djoko Susilo Aji Lukman Ibrahim
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1961

Abstract

In against the corruption crime, it must be established the distinct sanctions inorder to provide a deterrent effect to the corruptor and it is expected to decrease acorruption crime for the others. One of the ideas is applying expropriation as theadditional punishment. Djoko Susilo was first convicted criminal sentenced to haveexpropriation to vote and be elected rights in public official. The additional punishmentof expropriation for corruption is still relatively new and it is interesting to study. Onthis study is about the compatibility of expropriation to vote and be elected DjokoSusilo’s case in the public official on criminal code section 38 and how it is viewed fromthe perspective of human rights. This study uses normative juridical approach on theconstitution then compared with the additional punishment of expropriation to vote andbe elected Djoko Susilo’s case in the public official. It has occurred misconduct ofhandedness because revoke the rights to vote and be elected in Djoko Susilo’s case inpublic official without limiting it within a certain period as set out on criminal codesection 38. The rights to vote and be elected in public office is a part of human rights,then revoke, eliminate or negate the human rights even though through the verdict is ahuman rights violation.
Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pemilu Legislatif oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilu (BAWASLU) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Tahun 2014 Rani Nurroufah Pratiwi
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1959

Abstract

The general election is a manifestation of the people’s softreight in order toproduce a democratic goverment, elections that are direct, general, free, confidential,honest and fair can only be realized if the election management has high integrity andunderstand and respect the civil and political rights of citizens. Weak electionpotentially undermined qualified election organizers have a duty to hold elections byinstitutional national, permanent and independent. One of the importan factors for thesuccess of election it self, the election commission, ellaction watchdog, and honorary boardof election. Superfysory role of the comitte in general election by country or city loworganizing elections, over seeing in the implementation stage of the election in the regencyor city which includes, receving reports of alleged violations of the laws and theimplementation of the election law, and report the findings resolve election disputescontain no element of crime, deliver and report finding to the commition for the countryor city followd up, forward and report finding that are not its responsibility to theotorities to submit a report to the election Supervisory Body Relating to the allegedactions which resulted in disruption of the implementetion stage of elections by electoraladministration in country or city level
Illegal Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing: Upaya Mencegah dan Memberantas Illegal Fishing dalam Membangun Poros Maritim Indonesia Abdul Qodir Jaelani
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1958

Abstract

Indonesia has had some legislation as the legal basis on which the prevention anderadication of illegal fishing in Indonesia thats include the Territorial Sea Act 1939and the Maritime Environment (Territorial Zee en Maritime Kringen Ordonantie,Stbl.1939 No. 442), UU No. 17 of 1985 on the Ratification of the United NationsConvention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), UU No. 5 of 1983 on theIndonesian Exclusive Economic Zone, Act No. 21 of 1992 on Shipping, UU No. 6of 1996 About Indonesian water , UU No. 31 Year 2004 jo. Act No. 45 of 2009on the Fisheries Act No. 32 of about Marine, Regulation of the Minister of Marineand Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 / CANDY-KP / 2015 on theProhibition of the Use of Fishing Trawler and trawl Pull in Regional FisheriesManagement of the Republic of Indonesia. But the reality in Indonesia is still a lot ofcases of illegal fishing going on, it can be seen from the development of Non-TaxRevenues from KP sector fluctuated. In 2012, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK)estimates of IUU fishing state losses of Rp 300 trillion and cause damage to habitatsand marine ecosystems. Including illegal fishing that accompanied the destruction of themarine environment either by blast fishing, trawling, and using cyanide.
Masa Jabatan Kepala Desa Bangunharjo Kecamatan Sewon Kabupaten Bantul: Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa Iis Qomariyah
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1956

Abstract

The research concludes that the legal basis used Bangunharjo village chief areLaw No. 22 of 1999 on Regional Government. In Article 96 describes the "villagechief tenure of ten years or a maximum of two terms as of the date specified." Thoughthe law declared invalid because it has been replaced Law No. 32 of 2004 inconjunction with Law No. 12 of 2008 on Regional Government. The term of office ofsix years and the village chief can only be re-elected for a subsequent term of office.However, the researchers did a special case of the Village Head Bangunharjo serve timeover regulated by the Act. Term of office of the Village Head Bangunharjo not inaccordance with Law No. 6 2014 because the Act states that the village chief in officefor 6 years. Then be served at most three consecutive terms consecutively or notconsecutively. Basically the most recent regulations crippling/cancel the old rules, so therules have been replaced with the new rules, the old rules are automatically void.
Implementasi Sistem Keterwakilan Perempuan dalam Pemilu: Studi pada Masyarakat Patrilineal di Indonesia Bagus Anwar Hidayatulloh
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1954

Abstract

First regulation implementing quota policies 30% representation of women in thecomposition of the list of legislative candidates occurred in 2004. And until now therules are applied in the Act thereafter. Many areas of customary law in the country ofIndonesia implement patrilineal kinship system, which prioritizes family relationshipspaternal line, the position is more important than the position of the husband and wife.In asabah marriage act more as a guardian of marriage, marriage with an honestsystem, always follow the shelter's wife her husband. In the parental authority, thepower of the father (husband) take precedence over the power of women (wives) ofchildren in family relationships. Included in being a leader and representative of thepeople.
Eksistensi Densus 88: Analisis Evaluasi Dan Solusi Terkait Wacana Pembubaran Densus 88 Zainal Muhtar
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1953

Abstract

Corruption was considered detrimental to social and economic rights ofIndonesian society that is an extra-ordinary crime and a common enemy Indonesiansociety and the nation as a whole. Therefore, necessary extra-ordinary enforcement andextra-ordinary measures anyway. One such action is to conduct a comprehensive shift tothe existing verification system, by applying the reversal of burden of proof (omkeringvan bewijslast) in PTPK Act. The application of this principle tends to cause the shiftof the presumption of innocence to the presumption of guilt, whereas protection andrespect for Human Rights defendant can not be reduced at all and for any reason (nonderogable right). This paper attempts to examine the application of the reversal of theburden of proof (omkering van bewijslast) in the theoretical study and practice, to find atheoretical justification for the application of the reversal of the burden of proof inrelation to human rights perspective defendant.
Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak di bawah Umur oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 71/PID.SUS/2013/PN.YK) Agus Muzaqi
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1952

Abstract

The children are one of precious assets of each nation. As a part of the futuregeneration, the children has the strategic role to determine the success of such a nation.The criminal action of decent toward the under age children becomes the acute symptomand its occurrence quantity increases higher in the society. Therefore, it draws thesociety’s awareness about the importance to overcome the criminal action of decent. Onthe other hand, Police Unit of Republic Indonesia (Polri), as one of country agent tomaintain the safety, orderliness, and service for the society has an importance role toprotect the children from this criminal action of indecent. However, it is very ironic thatthe fact shows the opposite where there is such a part of the police who becomes thesubject of this criminal indecent case toward the under age child such as the writer hasfound in the verdict of the Judge Council (MK) of the District Court YogyakartaNumber 71/PID.SUS/2013/PN.YK. From this case, the writer is very interestedto analyze that verdict in order to know the Judge Council’s consideration in giving theverdict for the police as the subject of the indecent criminal toward the under age childwhich is observed based on Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak and KUHP.
Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak di Bawah Umur (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 128/Pid.Sus/2013/PTY) Imam Kholid
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1950

Abstract

This research shows that adjudicator in resolve murder case by children with caseNumber: 128/PID.Sus/2013/PTY tend to use juridical consideration that areProsecutor’s indictment, Witness’s Information, Defendant’s Information, evidence,criminal offense, and Clauses in KUHP and Children Court Regulation. In court, itfound that there is a child who didn’t accompanied by officer who was make case studywhich consist of the child’s description or condition. Besides in verification, adjudicatordidn’t call expert witness in children psychology. Meanwhile, non juridical considerationdidn’t use as consideration basis to give adjudication in case Number:128/PID.Sus/2013/PTY which based on sociology, psychology, criminology, andphilosophy of the child are didn’t used. Imprisonment provision based on sentencingpurpose review should be use double track system, if the sentencing purpose is to reprisalwithout rehabilitation and guidance isn’t yet proper because the sentencing purpose isn’tjust for reprisal, but it should brings benefit and improvement.
Perlindungan Hak-hak Konsumen E-Commerce dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia dan Konvensi Internasional Saefudin Saefudin
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1948

Abstract

In economy, consumers are usually placed as sub sides, their rights are ignored.On the contrary, producers/capitalist are always prioritied. Moreover, it develops cybereconomy such as e-commerce, e-trading, dropship and so on, the consumers position isweaker vis a vis producers’. Therefore, state must be present in regulating and protectingconsumers. Besides, global economy activities require the intervension of global andregional institution. This writing describes the concept of consumers protection in thepsoitive law of Indonesia and international covenant, especially related to e-commerce.
Konsep Ketertiban Umum dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional: Perbandingan Beberapa Negara Civil Law dan Common Law Sri Wahyuni
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v3i1.1947

Abstract

This article discusses about public order in the Private Internationale Lawcontext, relating to the acceptance to the foreign law in a country. Every country has thepublic order although they are different in concept and implementation. This publicorder principle is important as an emergency filter when a country faces a foreign law. Ifthe foreign law is incompatible to the public policy of the country, the foreign law can beignored. The country may use it own national law. The implementation of public orderprinciple relates to the other principles in the Private International Law, such asnationality, domicile and vested rights principles.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Supremasi Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2021): Supremasi Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Supremasi Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Supremasi Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Supremasi Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Supremasi Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Supremasi Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2018): Supremasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2018): Supremasi Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Supremasi Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2015): Supremasi Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2015): Supremasi Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2014): Supremasi Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2013): Supremasi Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): Supremasi Hukum More Issue